PEACE. It's a great idea. But what does it mean in practice, and how do you actually do it, on the the ground, in day-to-day realistic situations?
Young Peaceworkers at work is an interactive workshop presented by two young Quakers who will not only tell you, but show you and involve you too.
Rhiannon Redpath is placed with Gender Action for Peace and Security, working on the issue of women in Afghanistan.
Owen Everett is placed jointly with War Resisters' International and Forces Watch, working on countering the militarisation of young people.
They are part of the one-year popular Peaceworker scheme run by Quaker Peace and Social Witness for the last 20 years.
Hear about their experiences, share their enthusiasm. Inspiration is guaranteed!
The talk and workshop runs on Monday 26th August 2013, from 7.30-9.00pm, at the central Quaker Meeting House in Victoria Street, Edinburgh, EH1 2JL. Tickets can be bought at the venue and cost £5.
This is part of the joint Just Festival, Edinburgh Peace Initiative and Quaker lecture series.
More here.
Showing posts with label justSociety. Show all posts
Showing posts with label justSociety. Show all posts
Monday, 26 August 2013
LAST PERFORMANCE TODAY Tejas Verdes
ON 11th September 1973, General Pinochet seized power in a vicious coup that led to the death of democratically elected President Salvadore Allende and resulted in the death and torture of many thousands of people.
This is one of the 'other' 9/11s - a set of events with a great deal to teach us and remind us of, but one which is all-too-easily lost in the sands of history.
The scars of the US backed coup, sponsored by large corporations and shadowy right-wing networks inside and outside the country, have lasted well into the era of renewed democracy in the populous Latin American nation.
Tejas Verdes, once an idyllic seaside resort for the rich, beautiful and fortunate, became a torture and death camp under Pinochet's dictatorship. The torture was carried out in the old music room.
The critically acclaimed play Tejas Verdes remembers, with poetic beauty, overwhelming love and humanity, the story of a woman who was tortured and disappeared.
It is also the story of those who encountered her and were part of what happened to her.
Praised by Guardian critic Michael Billington ("Eloquently translated … impossible to forget"), Scottish broadcaster and journalist Jim Naughtie ("Warm, rich, even poetic") and actor Robbie Coltrane ("It really is the right time"), Tejas Verdes is showing throughout August as part of Just Festival.
The final performances are Sunday 25th August and Monday 26th August (both 2pm), with tickets £14 and £11.
Full details and booking here.
This is one of the 'other' 9/11s - a set of events with a great deal to teach us and remind us of, but one which is all-too-easily lost in the sands of history.
The scars of the US backed coup, sponsored by large corporations and shadowy right-wing networks inside and outside the country, have lasted well into the era of renewed democracy in the populous Latin American nation.
Tejas Verdes, once an idyllic seaside resort for the rich, beautiful and fortunate, became a torture and death camp under Pinochet's dictatorship. The torture was carried out in the old music room.
The critically acclaimed play Tejas Verdes remembers, with poetic beauty, overwhelming love and humanity, the story of a woman who was tortured and disappeared.
It is also the story of those who encountered her and were part of what happened to her.
Praised by Guardian critic Michael Billington ("Eloquently translated … impossible to forget"), Scottish broadcaster and journalist Jim Naughtie ("Warm, rich, even poetic") and actor Robbie Coltrane ("It really is the right time"), Tejas Verdes is showing throughout August as part of Just Festival.
The final performances are Sunday 25th August and Monday 26th August (both 2pm), with tickets £14 and £11.
Full details and booking here.
LAST DAY Peacing it all together
HOPEFULLY you've had a chance to see the In Sight of Peace exhibition on South Africa at St John's, Edinburgh (the hall, free).
If not, so try to take a look before the Just Festival ends today (Monday 26th August).
You can pop along today, or between 10am and 2pm Monday.
Meanwhile, here are a few inspirational quotes which set the context for Ian Berry's remarkable and moving images from the apartheid era and beyond...
More about the exhibition here.
If not, so try to take a look before the Just Festival ends today (Monday 26th August).
You can pop along today, or between 10am and 2pm Monday.
Meanwhile, here are a few inspirational quotes which set the context for Ian Berry's remarkable and moving images from the apartheid era and beyond...
More about the exhibition here.
Sunday, 25 August 2013
Getting stuck in to the future
WELL, no, we don't mean in an aggressive way - but not just talking, finding a new way of putting together our views so that we can make a difference!
That was what happened at Just Festival the other evening, as part of the session looking at citizenship and identity in Scotland, whichever way the referendum goes in September 2014 (and as part of the public exchange in the build-up to it).
Perry Walker of the inspirational New Economics Foundation (nef) brought along with him an abbreviated version of a word game which enables people to express themselves and hear one another in fresh ways. It involves choosing and linking words and phrases.
You can see people busy getting stuck in to the exchange (in the nicest way possible!) in our picture, with Perry supervising proceedings.
The Church of Scotland (with Imagining Scotland's Future) and So Say Scotland, who also held a Just workshop, are among those rolling out cafe-style civic conversations and we think about the future direction of our country, these islands. Europe and beyond.
The full live blog from the Just conversation about Scottish identity and citizenship can also be found here.
That was what happened at Just Festival the other evening, as part of the session looking at citizenship and identity in Scotland, whichever way the referendum goes in September 2014 (and as part of the public exchange in the build-up to it).
Perry Walker of the inspirational New Economics Foundation (nef) brought along with him an abbreviated version of a word game which enables people to express themselves and hear one another in fresh ways. It involves choosing and linking words and phrases.
You can see people busy getting stuck in to the exchange (in the nicest way possible!) in our picture, with Perry supervising proceedings.
The Church of Scotland (with Imagining Scotland's Future) and So Say Scotland, who also held a Just workshop, are among those rolling out cafe-style civic conversations and we think about the future direction of our country, these islands. Europe and beyond.
The full live blog from the Just conversation about Scottish identity and citizenship can also be found here.
The cost of peace
HERE'S a trailer for the touching and profound film Two-Sided Story, on the quest for reconciliation with justice in Israel and Palestine today.
It shows at 4pm, Sunday 25th August, St John's Church Hall, £6.
It shows at 4pm, Sunday 25th August, St John's Church Hall, £6.
Israel, Palestine... Two-sided story
ON Sunday afternoon, Just Festival has a special screening of the moving, insightful and thoughtful film Two-Sided Story.
It is a narrative involving 27 Palestinians and Israelis meeting for a unique project called ‘History through the Human Eye’.
Bereaved Palestinian families, Orthodox Jews and religious Muslims, settlers, ex-soldiers and ex-security prisoners, and citizens of the Gaza strip; each holds their own historical truth and shares their own emotional baggage with each other.
As Archbishop Elias Chacour, a Palestinian and citizen of Israel who has struggled tirelessly and nonviolently for a just peace in the land has observed: a settlement in Israel-Palestine, which must offer security and recognition for all people, is not just about politics. It is about disarmed truth, and recognising in each other a wounded bother and sister, not an enemy or a threat.
Tor Ben-Mayor • Israel Palestine 2010 • 1h15m • Hebrew, Arabic/English subtitles Rated 18.
The hall at St John's Church (corner of Princes Street and Lothian Road, venue 127). Tickets are £6 and can be purchased at the cash-only box office at the venue.
Sponsored by Parents Circle - Families Forum (PCFF), which is a grassroots organization of bereaved Palestinians and Israelis. The PCFF promotes reconciliation as an alternative to hatred and revenge.
It is a narrative involving 27 Palestinians and Israelis meeting for a unique project called ‘History through the Human Eye’.
Bereaved Palestinian families, Orthodox Jews and religious Muslims, settlers, ex-soldiers and ex-security prisoners, and citizens of the Gaza strip; each holds their own historical truth and shares their own emotional baggage with each other.
As Archbishop Elias Chacour, a Palestinian and citizen of Israel who has struggled tirelessly and nonviolently for a just peace in the land has observed: a settlement in Israel-Palestine, which must offer security and recognition for all people, is not just about politics. It is about disarmed truth, and recognising in each other a wounded bother and sister, not an enemy or a threat.
Tor Ben-Mayor • Israel Palestine 2010 • 1h15m • Hebrew, Arabic/English subtitles Rated 18.
The hall at St John's Church (corner of Princes Street and Lothian Road, venue 127). Tickets are £6 and can be purchased at the cash-only box office at the venue.
Sponsored by Parents Circle - Families Forum (PCFF), which is a grassroots organization of bereaved Palestinians and Israelis. The PCFF promotes reconciliation as an alternative to hatred and revenge.
Saturday, 24 August 2013
Singing 'I'm no a Billy, He's a Tim'
IT'S the day of the big game. One Rangers fan, one Celtic fan, in a single jail cell. The match isn't the only thing that will kick off.
The 'Old Firm' may play two divisions apart at the moment, but the rivalries and hatreds that get projected on them are just as strong.
Acclaimed writer Des Dillon's humorous take on the age-old issues of sectarianism and bigotry is one of a trio of plays on sectarianism in Scotland commissioned by Just Festival, formerly the Festival of Spirituality and Peace, from Edinburgh's Black Dingo Productions.
"McFarlane’s production does [the issue] justice, in every way that matters," writes critic and commentator Joyce McMillan in The Scotsman newspaper.
Tickets are £12, or £10 concessions. Web links to purchase here, or the cash box office at the venue (number 27), St John's Church (corner of Princes Street and Lothian Road), Edinburgh. The play runs has been on for the past few days and runs for one more night at Just, Saturday 24th August, from 20:30 – 21:50.
Black Dingo Productions is a not-for-profit organisation with a DIY ethic, established to help the development of grassroots and off the beaten track theatre in Edinburgh. For more information on the company, visit www.blackdingoproductions.co.uk.
The 'Old Firm' may play two divisions apart at the moment, but the rivalries and hatreds that get projected on them are just as strong.
Acclaimed writer Des Dillon's humorous take on the age-old issues of sectarianism and bigotry is one of a trio of plays on sectarianism in Scotland commissioned by Just Festival, formerly the Festival of Spirituality and Peace, from Edinburgh's Black Dingo Productions.
"McFarlane’s production does [the issue] justice, in every way that matters," writes critic and commentator Joyce McMillan in The Scotsman newspaper.
Tickets are £12, or £10 concessions. Web links to purchase here, or the cash box office at the venue (number 27), St John's Church (corner of Princes Street and Lothian Road), Edinburgh. The play runs has been on for the past few days and runs for one more night at Just, Saturday 24th August, from 20:30 – 21:50.
Black Dingo Productions is a not-for-profit organisation with a DIY ethic, established to help the development of grassroots and off the beaten track theatre in Edinburgh. For more information on the company, visit www.blackdingoproductions.co.uk.
Learn to be a world-changer
SITTING around pontificating about the state of the world. Moaning about how the world needs to head in a different direction. Actually doing something to change it.
Which of those three options is best? How do we move from theorising and complaining to acting?
One way is to hear the stories and experiences of people who have taken the difficulty and challenge of change into their hands and done something with it.
In what is certain to be an encouraging conversation at St John's Church at 2pm on Saturday 24th August, you will have the chance to meet inspiring young people who balance homework with changing the world.
They have had a positive effect on those they set out to help and their friends and families. What motivated them to be the change they wanted to see in the world (Gandhi) and what we can learn from them?
The interviews with our panellists will be followed by an open discussion.
The speakers will be representatives of Mary’s Meals, Fast Forward, Eczema Outreach Scotland, TRUE Colours, and Stonelaw High Fair Traders.
The chair will be Sean Lewis from Edinburgh and Lothians Regional Equality Council.
Tickets cost £5 and are available online or from the cash-only box office at the venue.
More information here.
Which of those three options is best? How do we move from theorising and complaining to acting?
One way is to hear the stories and experiences of people who have taken the difficulty and challenge of change into their hands and done something with it.
In what is certain to be an encouraging conversation at St John's Church at 2pm on Saturday 24th August, you will have the chance to meet inspiring young people who balance homework with changing the world.
They have had a positive effect on those they set out to help and their friends and families. What motivated them to be the change they wanted to see in the world (Gandhi) and what we can learn from them?
The interviews with our panellists will be followed by an open discussion.
The speakers will be representatives of Mary’s Meals, Fast Forward, Eczema Outreach Scotland, TRUE Colours, and Stonelaw High Fair Traders.
The chair will be Sean Lewis from Edinburgh and Lothians Regional Equality Council.
Tickets cost £5 and are available online or from the cash-only box office at the venue.
More information here.
Friday, 23 August 2013
Farm animals: just food or fellow creatures?
AN eager audience has arrived for tonight's conversation at St John's Just Festival conversation on animal ethics, farming and more.
The speakers are Peter Stevenson (Compassion in World Farming) and Dr Fritha Langford (University of Edinburgh and the Scottish Rural College), along with chair Michael Appleby (The World Society for the Protection of Animals).
The picture (not the panel!) indicates that there is a slight technical problem with transmitting photos right now, but as it happens we are starting with some pictures of the creatures being discussed and the conditions in which they are reared.
Overcrowded, barren and filthy conditions are sadly all too frequent, said Peter Stevenson, having shown some evidence for this. Treating animals simply as food means that we may adopt harm reduction and ensure some basic standards of safety, but developing a real sense of respect for the world and its creatures is a larger and more significant matter.
He quoted both St Basil of Caesarea: "May we recognise that they exist not for us alone, but for us and thee..." and from Lyle Watson, in The Whole Hog.
Fritha Langford, from an academic point of view, wants to ask about the researched needs of animals and what they, in themselves, 'bring to the table' in terms of the debate about treatment and ethics. What matters to a cow? How can one know?
So how can we feed the world sustainably, while also treating farm animals humanely? It's 9 billion people by 2050 we are talking about. The real issue is sustainability, says Peter. "factory farming is very inefficient" - the calories we get back are minimal, compared to the grain inputs.
Could there be a different food source for pigs and sheep, say, sake Fritha? Grass and connective materials, replied Peter, converting something we can't eat into something we can. "The very systems that are so flawed are the ones that are inhumane."
In the developed world we should be eating fewer animal products more sustainably and humanely produced. In the developing world, the issues are different, and the two should not be confused.
We need to look at the life cycle, system measurements and particular needs, suggested Fritha, also factoring in the carbon footprint.
An organic chicken takes more carbon to produce, but if you eat less it balances it out, commented Michael Appleby.
Food waste, changes in consumption patterns and changes in distribution are key to feeding the world, Peter and Michael. 2.75 billion people could be fed by halving waste and grain feed, Peter said. The idea that we need 70% more production per se misses these issues of policy and responsibility.
The issue of fish farming and welfare was one that needed much greater attention, the panel agreed. There was also a need for more data and knowledge.
Breeding units in Scotland feature millions of fish in a unit the size of a small hall. The ethical question, said Peter, was about the distinction between natural and farmed behaviour. "The science cannot yet tell us, 'does the fish mind'," but that does not remove responsibility and judgement.
'Cheap food' is the real culprit, Peter suggests. It is only cheap because real costs are not factored in - health, environment, and so on. We in the west are eating poor food, and it is the taxpayer, the health service and future generations who are paying.
Professor Tim Lang has said that the current factory-based system is a crazy use of resources, crazy economics and crazy for health.
Supermarkets say "we are simply giving customers what we want", as if they and their advertising had no part in shaping a culture of expectation among consumers.
"We are not being helped as a society to be grown up and mature about food and animals", Peter Stevenson declared.
What of the horsemeat scandal? Has it changed anything? "I don't think it has made us as a society say that we want to rethink how we derive meat and dairy products," Peter responded. "The way we treat animals in factory farming is awful. The pictures I showed you earlier are illegal, but there is a major problem with enforcement..."
How do we know where our food comes from and by what means? This is another major issue, along with who controls and disseminates such information.
Retailers and supermarkets are also often "hiding the truth from consumers". The internet can be a help, but it is not a substitute for good, pro-active communication and dialogue.
Education must play a major role in changing attitudes, sustainability and healthy food production. Dr Fritha Langford said that there was growing interest in animal welfare in schools in Scotland, some of it government backed. That includes companion animals. Taking children to farms is important, too, though there can be obstacles.
"If you can run a farm on which you are perfectly happy to have school trips and visitors, then you are probably doing something right," said Michael. "If you are ashamed, there's a problem."
Talking of choices consumers may make: schemes like the RSPCA Freedom Food scheme, though not perfect, are better in what they recommend than the factory system, it was suggested. Free range and organic approaches have a number of advantages overall.
The question of 'fellow creatures' suggests that we are not just using animals, but we are in some sense entering a contract with them, working with them.
"We need to move way from overuse of human edible grain as a major source of food, eating less meat and making it better... It is also a matter of ethics, of spirituality, of rebalancing... and recognising ourselves as creatures," concluded Peter, questioning the dominant 'consumer society' paradigm.
This has been an evolving blog... do add your own comments or corrections.
The speakers are Peter Stevenson (Compassion in World Farming) and Dr Fritha Langford (University of Edinburgh and the Scottish Rural College), along with chair Michael Appleby (The World Society for the Protection of Animals).
The picture (not the panel!) indicates that there is a slight technical problem with transmitting photos right now, but as it happens we are starting with some pictures of the creatures being discussed and the conditions in which they are reared.
Overcrowded, barren and filthy conditions are sadly all too frequent, said Peter Stevenson, having shown some evidence for this. Treating animals simply as food means that we may adopt harm reduction and ensure some basic standards of safety, but developing a real sense of respect for the world and its creatures is a larger and more significant matter.
He quoted both St Basil of Caesarea: "May we recognise that they exist not for us alone, but for us and thee..." and from Lyle Watson, in The Whole Hog.
Fritha Langford, from an academic point of view, wants to ask about the researched needs of animals and what they, in themselves, 'bring to the table' in terms of the debate about treatment and ethics. What matters to a cow? How can one know?
So how can we feed the world sustainably, while also treating farm animals humanely? It's 9 billion people by 2050 we are talking about. The real issue is sustainability, says Peter. "factory farming is very inefficient" - the calories we get back are minimal, compared to the grain inputs.
Could there be a different food source for pigs and sheep, say, sake Fritha? Grass and connective materials, replied Peter, converting something we can't eat into something we can. "The very systems that are so flawed are the ones that are inhumane."
In the developed world we should be eating fewer animal products more sustainably and humanely produced. In the developing world, the issues are different, and the two should not be confused.
We need to look at the life cycle, system measurements and particular needs, suggested Fritha, also factoring in the carbon footprint.
An organic chicken takes more carbon to produce, but if you eat less it balances it out, commented Michael Appleby.
Food waste, changes in consumption patterns and changes in distribution are key to feeding the world, Peter and Michael. 2.75 billion people could be fed by halving waste and grain feed, Peter said. The idea that we need 70% more production per se misses these issues of policy and responsibility.
The issue of fish farming and welfare was one that needed much greater attention, the panel agreed. There was also a need for more data and knowledge.
Breeding units in Scotland feature millions of fish in a unit the size of a small hall. The ethical question, said Peter, was about the distinction between natural and farmed behaviour. "The science cannot yet tell us, 'does the fish mind'," but that does not remove responsibility and judgement.
'Cheap food' is the real culprit, Peter suggests. It is only cheap because real costs are not factored in - health, environment, and so on. We in the west are eating poor food, and it is the taxpayer, the health service and future generations who are paying.
Professor Tim Lang has said that the current factory-based system is a crazy use of resources, crazy economics and crazy for health.
Supermarkets say "we are simply giving customers what we want", as if they and their advertising had no part in shaping a culture of expectation among consumers.
"We are not being helped as a society to be grown up and mature about food and animals", Peter Stevenson declared.
What of the horsemeat scandal? Has it changed anything? "I don't think it has made us as a society say that we want to rethink how we derive meat and dairy products," Peter responded. "The way we treat animals in factory farming is awful. The pictures I showed you earlier are illegal, but there is a major problem with enforcement..."
How do we know where our food comes from and by what means? This is another major issue, along with who controls and disseminates such information.
Retailers and supermarkets are also often "hiding the truth from consumers". The internet can be a help, but it is not a substitute for good, pro-active communication and dialogue.
Education must play a major role in changing attitudes, sustainability and healthy food production. Dr Fritha Langford said that there was growing interest in animal welfare in schools in Scotland, some of it government backed. That includes companion animals. Taking children to farms is important, too, though there can be obstacles.
"If you can run a farm on which you are perfectly happy to have school trips and visitors, then you are probably doing something right," said Michael. "If you are ashamed, there's a problem."
Talking of choices consumers may make: schemes like the RSPCA Freedom Food scheme, though not perfect, are better in what they recommend than the factory system, it was suggested. Free range and organic approaches have a number of advantages overall.
The question of 'fellow creatures' suggests that we are not just using animals, but we are in some sense entering a contract with them, working with them.
"We need to move way from overuse of human edible grain as a major source of food, eating less meat and making it better... It is also a matter of ethics, of spirituality, of rebalancing... and recognising ourselves as creatures," concluded Peter, questioning the dominant 'consumer society' paradigm.
This has been an evolving blog... do add your own comments or corrections.
Thinking about citizenship and identity
"CITIZENSHIP - it's what we do," said Moira Tasker of Citizens Advice Edinburgh, introducing tonight's conversation at St John's on identity, citizenship and the 2014 independence referendum.
Moira is chairing the discussion, and the speakers are Iain G. Mitchell QC (in a personal capacity) and Perry Walker (New Economics Foundation, and a leading proponent of citizens' democracy).
Iain Mitchell started by talking about the debate of the head and the heart, and the very different feelings which people have about Scottish, British and European identities, individually and collectively.
"If we conduct the debate on independence without mutual respect from each others' identities, it will be very sterile," he declared.
Perry Walker began to look at the different 'narratives' involved. The pro-independence one might be, for example, "it's time to grow up". The counter-narrative would be about constraints from London and the EU, in terms of ownership.
On the pro-UK side the narrative may be about "the family of Britain". Again, the counter-argument might be about the suppression of the Scottish part of that identity as part of empire.
"Identity is about where we are comfortable being at home," Iain Mitchell responded. "But yer ain folk might be the whole world, or a significant part of it." History has a part to play. "I do have difficulty with the quasi-mysticism of identity with the land... because at its worst it can become exclusive."
At present, people born here or with the right of citizenship actually have two such legal citizenships - British and European - though many are not aware of this. Independence might, Mitchell suggested, challenge that. But to what extent is the sense of being a citizen a legal or a participation one?
He added that, with the possible exception of the EU, where he suggested that the broad legal consensus is that Scotland would be a new member and the other parts of what is now the UK would be a continuing member, Scottish membership of other international treaties and organisations would not be especially problematic under independence.
However, Mitchell said, what was needed was to define the debate better - again, both at the heart and head level.
Perry Walker explained that, as someone based in England, his interest was in citizens' participation and engagement, and that the card game he has brought along this evening is based on trying to listen to a variety of views across the political spectrum.
"For every expert there is an equal and opposite expert, it has been said," he added. "The decision we take is partly going to be about choosing narratives."
On the economic front, there are choices, but also assessments about the political probability of moving one way or another, Perry suggested. Iain felt there was little real room for manoeuvre.
An audience member said that she felt, however, that decisions for public ownership and industrial/social support would be both significant and possible.
After engaging with the card game, people said that they wanted a less politically charged debate, more information, and an acknowledgement that the decisions involved confidence (or not) in those who would have to negotiate and decide at the governmental level - but with influence and participation of people and communities.
The aim of the evening was not to have a partisan argument, but to deepen understanding and the ability to engage. The sense was that those taking part were grateful for that.
[Image: Focus Scotland].
This is an evolving live blog...
Moira is chairing the discussion, and the speakers are Iain G. Mitchell QC (in a personal capacity) and Perry Walker (New Economics Foundation, and a leading proponent of citizens' democracy).
Iain Mitchell started by talking about the debate of the head and the heart, and the very different feelings which people have about Scottish, British and European identities, individually and collectively.
"If we conduct the debate on independence without mutual respect from each others' identities, it will be very sterile," he declared.
Perry Walker began to look at the different 'narratives' involved. The pro-independence one might be, for example, "it's time to grow up". The counter-narrative would be about constraints from London and the EU, in terms of ownership.
On the pro-UK side the narrative may be about "the family of Britain". Again, the counter-argument might be about the suppression of the Scottish part of that identity as part of empire.
"Identity is about where we are comfortable being at home," Iain Mitchell responded. "But yer ain folk might be the whole world, or a significant part of it." History has a part to play. "I do have difficulty with the quasi-mysticism of identity with the land... because at its worst it can become exclusive."
At present, people born here or with the right of citizenship actually have two such legal citizenships - British and European - though many are not aware of this. Independence might, Mitchell suggested, challenge that. But to what extent is the sense of being a citizen a legal or a participation one?
He added that, with the possible exception of the EU, where he suggested that the broad legal consensus is that Scotland would be a new member and the other parts of what is now the UK would be a continuing member, Scottish membership of other international treaties and organisations would not be especially problematic under independence.
However, Mitchell said, what was needed was to define the debate better - again, both at the heart and head level.
Perry Walker explained that, as someone based in England, his interest was in citizens' participation and engagement, and that the card game he has brought along this evening is based on trying to listen to a variety of views across the political spectrum.
"For every expert there is an equal and opposite expert, it has been said," he added. "The decision we take is partly going to be about choosing narratives."
On the economic front, there are choices, but also assessments about the political probability of moving one way or another, Perry suggested. Iain felt there was little real room for manoeuvre.
An audience member said that she felt, however, that decisions for public ownership and industrial/social support would be both significant and possible.
After engaging with the card game, people said that they wanted a less politically charged debate, more information, and an acknowledgement that the decisions involved confidence (or not) in those who would have to negotiate and decide at the governmental level - but with influence and participation of people and communities.
The aim of the evening was not to have a partisan argument, but to deepen understanding and the ability to engage. The sense was that those taking part were grateful for that.
[Image: Focus Scotland].
This is an evolving live blog...
Seeds of bitterness, milk of kindness...
THE recent revelations about direct CIA involvement in the 1953 Iranian coup d'état (known in Iran as the 28 Mordad coup) bring back very personal memories for Yousef Ahadi, who heads up the operation at the Persian Tent.
The overthrow of the democratically elected government of Iran, and of Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, took place on 19 August 1953, orchestrated by the UK (under the name 'Operation Boot') and the United States (under the name TPAJAX Project).
Yousef's mother was taking part in a protest against the dictatorship, with Yousef alongside her... the outcome of which is that he reckons the CIA owe him at least a bottle of milk!
Much more seriously, though, he explains in this interview with Just Festival News why the latest revelations need to bring about a real change of heart in the West - and in the world as a whole - away from violence and injustice, and towards a better way of living together.
The legacy of the bitterness between Iran and the West can be found in part in the tragic events which unfolded 60 years ago this month. You can also find out more about Yousef's mother's story here.
Listen to the full podcast here.
The overthrow of the democratically elected government of Iran, and of Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, took place on 19 August 1953, orchestrated by the UK (under the name 'Operation Boot') and the United States (under the name TPAJAX Project).
Yousef's mother was taking part in a protest against the dictatorship, with Yousef alongside her... the outcome of which is that he reckons the CIA owe him at least a bottle of milk!
Much more seriously, though, he explains in this interview with Just Festival News why the latest revelations need to bring about a real change of heart in the West - and in the world as a whole - away from violence and injustice, and towards a better way of living together.
The legacy of the bitterness between Iran and the West can be found in part in the tragic events which unfolded 60 years ago this month. You can also find out more about Yousef's mother's story here.
Are animals more than just food?
The debate about how we treat animals is particularly intense around modern farming methods, intensive rearing and the sheer scale of local, regional and global food industries.
Pragmatically and ethically, is treating animals well a luxury we can’t afford or a feature of our spiritual journey through the world which we cannot be without?
The reality is that the majority of the animals who provide our meat, milk and eggs for us (whether we are carnivores herbivores, ovo-lacto vegetarians or pescatarians) are factory farmed.
What is done to them is done in the name of efficiency and cheap food. But is it really cheap or efficient? Can we eat well and behave towards animals with humanity?
The speakers at an important conversation on all this today, as part of Just Festival, will be Peter Stevenson (Compassion in World Farming), Dr Fritha Langford (Scotland's Rural College), along with chair Michael Appleby (The World Society for the Protection of Animals).
The discussion runs from 6-7.30pm in the hall at St John's Church (venue 127), Friday 23rd August, priced £5. Tickets can be purchased online, or at the cash-only ticket office at the venue. Organised in association with Compassion in World Farming.
Scottish identity and citizenship
THE Scottish Independence Referendum has opened up serious discussions about Scotland’s identity and citizenship.
How might Scotland’s sense of self be defined after centuries of Union and immigration? Will this affect the voting in September 2014, and if so how?
Equally, what should be taken into account while revisiting legal aspects of granting citizenship? How will the Referendum shape intra-British and European relations?
These and other issues will be considered today in a conversation on Citizenship and Identity as part of Just Festival 2013, co-sponsored by the European Movement in Scotland.
The Speakers will be Iain G. Mitchell QC (Murray Stable) and Perry Walker (New Economics Foundation, and a leading proponent of citizens' democracy). The chair will be Moira Tasker (Citizen Advice Edinburgh).
The conversation runs from 4-5.30pm, Friday 23rd August, in the hall at St John's Church (venue 127).
Full details and booking here.
Tickets, which are £5, can also be purchased on the day at the venue's cash-only ticket office.
How might Scotland’s sense of self be defined after centuries of Union and immigration? Will this affect the voting in September 2014, and if so how?
Equally, what should be taken into account while revisiting legal aspects of granting citizenship? How will the Referendum shape intra-British and European relations?
These and other issues will be considered today in a conversation on Citizenship and Identity as part of Just Festival 2013, co-sponsored by the European Movement in Scotland.
The Speakers will be Iain G. Mitchell QC (Murray Stable) and Perry Walker (New Economics Foundation, and a leading proponent of citizens' democracy). The chair will be Moira Tasker (Citizen Advice Edinburgh).
The conversation runs from 4-5.30pm, Friday 23rd August, in the hall at St John's Church (venue 127).
Full details and booking here.
Tickets, which are £5, can also be purchased on the day at the venue's cash-only ticket office.
Thursday, 22 August 2013
Resisting dictatorship
Kalinovski Square, which shows as part of Just Festival at the Edinburgh Filmhouse tonight (6-8pm) is an award-winning 2007 documentary film by Belarusian filmmaker Yury Khashchavatski.
The film takes a critical look at the re-election of Alexander Lukashenko in March 2006, featuring especially the protests that occurred after the election was found to be fraudulent.
These protests had their centre at October Square in downdown Minsk, which was informally renamed on the occasion for Konstanty Kalinowski.
Before its commercial release on DVD in June 2009, the film was distributed under the title The Square.
The Belarussian authorities had already taken exception to the work of director Khashchavatski, following his first movie, An Ordinary President, released in 1996.
As a result, all production for Kalinovski Square was done underground.
With his astonishing footage and ironic discourses, Yuri Khashchavatski speaks out about resistance and persecution, displaying an overwhelming will for freedom.
Full booking details here. Tickets are £8.20 and £6. The showing is sponsored by the European Parliament.
The film takes a critical look at the re-election of Alexander Lukashenko in March 2006, featuring especially the protests that occurred after the election was found to be fraudulent.
These protests had their centre at October Square in downdown Minsk, which was informally renamed on the occasion for Konstanty Kalinowski.
Before its commercial release on DVD in June 2009, the film was distributed under the title The Square.
The Belarussian authorities had already taken exception to the work of director Khashchavatski, following his first movie, An Ordinary President, released in 1996.
As a result, all production for Kalinovski Square was done underground.
With his astonishing footage and ironic discourses, Yuri Khashchavatski speaks out about resistance and persecution, displaying an overwhelming will for freedom.
Full booking details here. Tickets are £8.20 and £6. The showing is sponsored by the European Parliament.
Wednesday, 21 August 2013
Banking on the future
HERE we are at the Quaker Meeting House in central Edinburgh, ready to learn about a different approach to banking and how an enterprise like Triodos can make a real difference.
"Triodos is a global pioneer of sustainable banking. Our mission is to make money work for positive social, environmental and cultural change.
"More specifically, we are in business to help create a society that protects and promotes the quality of life of all its members; to enable individuals, organisations and businesses to use their money in ways that benefit people and the environment and promote sustainable development; and to provide our customers with innovative financial products and high quality service."
All that sounds very noble. But what does it mean?
Now is not a good time to be a banker. "We may have the liberty to do certain things, but are they morally correct," said Neil Hewitt. "So welcome to sustainable banking." This is about being conscious of the environmental and social impact money, transparency, linking savers and investors, focussing on the needs of future generations as well as our own.
Triodos lends deposits on for social benefit. It originated 30 years ago in the Netherlands, out of a banking crisis. The bank now has over 700 co-workers (as they are called), having grown significantly. It has been in the UK for 17 years, and five in Scotland. It took over Mercury Provident in Brighton, moving to Bristol (not London).
The aim of the organisation is to help people, both individually and collectively, to become much more aware of how money is generated and used.
The projects Triodos supports have to environmentally and socially beneficial, but also financially sustainable: that the business is there not only for today, but for tomorrow.
"Transparency is our leading way of ensuring that depositors, our customers, know where the money goes," Neil declared. All the information about the projects is published. There is no hidden funding of armaments or other negative industries.
Excellence and credibility is necessary to solidify people's relationship with the bank, because they are not just buying into values but also entrusting their resources. The management of a business that seeks to be on the leading edge has to be entrepreneurial, but also informed: about what political and funding changes are driving things like healthcare, for example.
This means that policies and products can be effective, but also support innovators in the fields where investment is going on.
Changes in the Charities Act have had a positive impact on deposit range, matching the need for a financial return with other aims.
Organic farming and ethical trading businesses (Cafe Direct, River Cottage, etc.) are an important part of what Triodos supports in the agricultural and commercial field.
Hydro, solar and other renewable energy resources are elements of the environment team's engagement, supporting industry and jobs.
The social and cultural team's work varies across housing associations, to health, faith groups, charities and more.
There is a longstanding relationship with the Camp Hill community movement, in Scotland (it started in Aberdeen after the war) and Ireland. That includes green waste and recycling in Edinburgh, as well as small holding elsewhere. "Our money is being used in a very constructive way."
When faith groups are supported, it is because of community involvement (youth, elderly people, food banks), not as a way of endorsing a particular belief system. There should not be obstacles put in the way of service.
Quakers especially, but also evangelical Christians, Buddhists and a Sikh group are among the partners.
Growth in lending, now at £580 million, has extended by 16% in the last year or so. Bad debts, meanwhile, have dwindled and are not a problem - 0.16% of the entire loan book.
But there is an awareness that the financial crisis and cuts are hitting individuals, charities, service providers and others. So Triodos seeks to work closely with them to move forward and address the issues.
So there is no 'big black book', but a determination to manage risk responsibly.
People, planet and profit are the triple 'bottom line'. Triodos declares: "Our approach is based on the fundamental belief that economic activity can and should have a positive impact on society, the environment and culture. We value people, planet and profit - and take all three into account in everything we do.
"We call this sustainable banking. And it explains why we invest only in, or lend only to, organisations that contribute to a more sustainable society."
Triodos does not have a counter service, but in Scotland uses RBS as a high street facility for its savings accounts. At present, it doesn't have a current account, but is investigating that possibility.
Questions started off with the assessment of risk, given the difficulty of predicting the return from social enterprises. How does a different lending model operate? By being mobile, intelligent and engaged.
There are no collaterialised securities, inter-bank loans etc. All is done through lending on deposit. Loans and interest are commercially priced. "We are not the cheapest, and we can't be just on price... it's the whole package."
Is liquidity a worry? "No, we're ahead of the game.." A transparent model is commercially successful, as people flee from failing 'orthodox' model.
[Note: Just Festival does not endorse particular financial products and services]
This has been an evolving live blog... please do add comments or corrections.
"Triodos is a global pioneer of sustainable banking. Our mission is to make money work for positive social, environmental and cultural change.
"More specifically, we are in business to help create a society that protects and promotes the quality of life of all its members; to enable individuals, organisations and businesses to use their money in ways that benefit people and the environment and promote sustainable development; and to provide our customers with innovative financial products and high quality service."
All that sounds very noble. But what does it mean?
Now is not a good time to be a banker. "We may have the liberty to do certain things, but are they morally correct," said Neil Hewitt. "So welcome to sustainable banking." This is about being conscious of the environmental and social impact money, transparency, linking savers and investors, focussing on the needs of future generations as well as our own.
Triodos lends deposits on for social benefit. It originated 30 years ago in the Netherlands, out of a banking crisis. The bank now has over 700 co-workers (as they are called), having grown significantly. It has been in the UK for 17 years, and five in Scotland. It took over Mercury Provident in Brighton, moving to Bristol (not London).
The aim of the organisation is to help people, both individually and collectively, to become much more aware of how money is generated and used.
The projects Triodos supports have to environmentally and socially beneficial, but also financially sustainable: that the business is there not only for today, but for tomorrow.
"Transparency is our leading way of ensuring that depositors, our customers, know where the money goes," Neil declared. All the information about the projects is published. There is no hidden funding of armaments or other negative industries.
Excellence and credibility is necessary to solidify people's relationship with the bank, because they are not just buying into values but also entrusting their resources. The management of a business that seeks to be on the leading edge has to be entrepreneurial, but also informed: about what political and funding changes are driving things like healthcare, for example.
This means that policies and products can be effective, but also support innovators in the fields where investment is going on.
Changes in the Charities Act have had a positive impact on deposit range, matching the need for a financial return with other aims.
Organic farming and ethical trading businesses (Cafe Direct, River Cottage, etc.) are an important part of what Triodos supports in the agricultural and commercial field.
Hydro, solar and other renewable energy resources are elements of the environment team's engagement, supporting industry and jobs.
The social and cultural team's work varies across housing associations, to health, faith groups, charities and more.
There is a longstanding relationship with the Camp Hill community movement, in Scotland (it started in Aberdeen after the war) and Ireland. That includes green waste and recycling in Edinburgh, as well as small holding elsewhere. "Our money is being used in a very constructive way."
When faith groups are supported, it is because of community involvement (youth, elderly people, food banks), not as a way of endorsing a particular belief system. There should not be obstacles put in the way of service.
Quakers especially, but also evangelical Christians, Buddhists and a Sikh group are among the partners.
Growth in lending, now at £580 million, has extended by 16% in the last year or so. Bad debts, meanwhile, have dwindled and are not a problem - 0.16% of the entire loan book.
But there is an awareness that the financial crisis and cuts are hitting individuals, charities, service providers and others. So Triodos seeks to work closely with them to move forward and address the issues.
So there is no 'big black book', but a determination to manage risk responsibly.
People, planet and profit are the triple 'bottom line'. Triodos declares: "Our approach is based on the fundamental belief that economic activity can and should have a positive impact on society, the environment and culture. We value people, planet and profit - and take all three into account in everything we do.
"We call this sustainable banking. And it explains why we invest only in, or lend only to, organisations that contribute to a more sustainable society."
Triodos does not have a counter service, but in Scotland uses RBS as a high street facility for its savings accounts. At present, it doesn't have a current account, but is investigating that possibility.
Questions started off with the assessment of risk, given the difficulty of predicting the return from social enterprises. How does a different lending model operate? By being mobile, intelligent and engaged.
There are no collaterialised securities, inter-bank loans etc. All is done through lending on deposit. Loans and interest are commercially priced. "We are not the cheapest, and we can't be just on price... it's the whole package."
Is liquidity a worry? "No, we're ahead of the game.." A transparent model is commercially successful, as people flee from failing 'orthodox' model.
[Note: Just Festival does not endorse particular financial products and services]
This has been an evolving live blog... please do add comments or corrections.
Getting down to business, socially
BUSINESS with a conscience and social enterprise to tackle poverty and improve society - these are two themes buzzing around in Scotland and more widely at the moment.
But what do they mean, and is socially driven business sustainable? If so, how? These were two of the questions posed at the beginning of this lively conversation on 'Business for the other 99%' by the chair, Martin Simes, CEO of the Scottish Council of Voluntary Service (SCVO).
The speakers this evening will be Frank McKillop (ABCUL), Kirsty Burnham (SoLoCo), and Josh Littlejohn (Social Bite). Habib Malik (Islamic Relief Worldwide) was sadly not able to be there.
Credit unions are member-owned cooperatives offering financial services, explained Frank McKillop. There are one hundred plus in Scotland, and another 300 or more elsewhere in these islands. The exception at present is Perth and Kinross, but that gap will be filled soon.
Some 327,000 people (44,000 junior savers) are served by CUs in Scotland, borrowing £24 million with another £335 million saved. This is small by banking standards, but has enormous potential, as Archbishop Justin Welby has pointed out, among others.
Josh Littlejohn (Social Bite) started out setting up an events company business. Inspired by Nobel Prize winner Muhammad Yunus and his 'social business' vision, he then set up a sandwich shop which not only offers good food but involves homeless people in running it. It has been so successful that another will be following.
At the same tim, Josh kept one event, the Scottish Business Awards, going (former US president Bill Clinton has been involved) and has also helped set up the Scottish Social Business Fund.
Kirsty Burnham's SoLoCo supports people involved in crowd-funding ventures. This helps people to build and market the business while raising funds for it - in Kirsty's instance, involving selling chocolate bricks!
Globally, 40% of the world's population exists on just 6% of its resources, Josh pointed out. Many are excluded from the business world. Charities depend on a few generous individuals. Social enterprise combines the self-propelling and self-running features of business, but with social benefit built in at every level. This is a much better way forward.
What about Credit Unions? Are they social enterprises? Yes, says Frank. The aim of the DWP and the movement is to double itself by 2019, with an emphasis on developing a technological advantage. In places like Kenya, CU's are ahead of the game by using mobile phones. There is great potential in Eutope. 200 million people use them in 100 countries, including a quarter of the populations in the US and Canada.
But will Crddit Unions's end up simply being privatised? We must guard against this. At present, they cannot be de-mutualised by law, only dissolved, and that is a great protection. It is important to keep the cherry-pickers and carpet-baggers away.
The important thing is that these bodies are built by users, not investors. They have a potential to address the major problem of financial institutions recently, which is that they are driven by shareholders with narrow interests.
There are also businesses that are somewhat 'in between', like John Lewis, which is employee owned but does not have a particular social mission.
'Community owned' has a stigma attached to it in some quarters - the idea that the quality will somehow be lower quality, This needs to be challenged. Likewise, Credit Unions should not be seen as a "poor person's bank" in the negative sense.
The dominant assumptions of business since the 1980s have been that 'private' is good and efficient, whereas 'social' or 'public' is inefficient. But the financial crash and the emergence of different models of business are questioning this profoundly.
GDP, for example, offers a money measure of 'success', but not an environmental or social impact one. In the US, sociologists and entrepreneurs are beginning to talk about the 'caring economy'.
"There is still a whole world that doesn't yet get this," observed Kirsty. "Entering our world is like entering Narnia for them, a wholly different universe."
Oxfam's Human Kind Index is one of the developing alternatives to narrow GDP growth models, indicated Martin Simes, pointing out that the social sector was in many respects outperforming the traditional private sector.
Given global developments in recent years, the first question we should ask is about the sustainability of the current system.
"The biggest problem when I came out of university was that social business was just not in my consciousness," observed Josh. Visibility is the key. Social enterprise needs its brands, and people need to get that it is something for them, not just something for someone else to do and think about.
"We need to change the language, we need to be normal," declared Martin.
"If we become a brilliant sandwich shop, then we have the edge," said Josh of Social Bite. "Because no one can compete with our story, with the involvement of homeless people, and with the other things we do."
So is there a marketing edge to all this? There is for those involved, said Martin Simes. "We get people queuing up to work in our sector. It's a significant motivator. People want to be able to do something useful with their lives."
Big investment and funding is also crucial, and it is beginning to take off in Scotland and elsewhere, he added.
"Leadership is such a key aspect in any Credit Union or social enterprise," said Frank McKillop. "Someone who can take it to the next step, but then also help to replicate and develop models and best practice. There are enthusiasts who can be trained and mentored. We have to work together to achieve succession planning - one of the most important courses we offer, though not enough people go on it!"
Education is another key. People leaving school need to know that social business is an option for them. Also, people need to see the tangible difference it makes, locally and globally. It is a question of tapping into, and broadening, the enthusasism.
At present you can do an MA in social enterprise at the University of Bangalore in India, but not in Scotland. That needs to change.
"A passionate workforce who want to bring change" is a crucial resource, Kirsty said.
What of the Co-operative movement and ideal which has deep historical roots going back to the nineteenth century? It can and does play a major role in enabling community ownership, for example of wind farms. But the Co-op Bank has run into problems, not being member-owned and being dragged in a commercially top-heavy direction.
"Being a social entrepreneur is an expensive hobby," one audience member observed. "Being an entrepreneur, full stop!", replied Kirsty. Resources for start-ups can be tough. Vision and passion can remain the same, how you get to it may change.
Where can you find information? Well, all of the supporting organisations for this conversation, and Social Enterprise Scotland, can provide support, ideas and info. Also the Yunnus Centre.
And what about governance and regulation? Frank said that he felt it was very important that good quality standards and rules were maintained in the social sector. There are, said Martin, some fraudsters out there and we need to be wary of them.
Where does social enterprise government meet social entrepreneurship? Changing the culture of government to a 'can do' one from a risk-averse or bureaucratic mentality is important. Mechanisms like Community Enterprise Companies (CiCs) can be very helpful mediating structures.
Large amounts of transparency are one of the benefits of social business. There is also a need to have support to scale up new organisations.
Just Festival director Katherine Newbigging asked about the dilution of Fairtrade and social enterprise by large corporations.
This is an issue that needs to be faced, commented Josh. "Social business needs to be a major block within the economy, which it isn't yet. We need good regulation, tax incentives, and so on."
"We shouldn't be too precious towards categorizing social enterprise. But we do have to be quite protective of what isn't social enterprise," declared Frank McKillop. "There is a present danger in our sector from those coming in to extract a profit for a small group of investors. If most of the benefit is going into private hands, it isn't really social."
So does social business need an overarching brand? There were mixed views. Different models are important. It is about spreading the socialising idea far and wide.
"A lot depends on getting the message out and getting people involved," Frank added. "Remember the Halifax - it was demutualized and then became a privately owned bank that cheated its customers and became involved in the downward spiral that led to the crash."
Social enterprise is about reversing that negative spiral. It needs to be a big part of a better future.
This has been a developing live blog... please do add comments or corrections below.
But what do they mean, and is socially driven business sustainable? If so, how? These were two of the questions posed at the beginning of this lively conversation on 'Business for the other 99%' by the chair, Martin Simes, CEO of the Scottish Council of Voluntary Service (SCVO).
The speakers this evening will be Frank McKillop (ABCUL), Kirsty Burnham (SoLoCo), and Josh Littlejohn (Social Bite). Habib Malik (Islamic Relief Worldwide) was sadly not able to be there.
Credit unions are member-owned cooperatives offering financial services, explained Frank McKillop. There are one hundred plus in Scotland, and another 300 or more elsewhere in these islands. The exception at present is Perth and Kinross, but that gap will be filled soon.
Some 327,000 people (44,000 junior savers) are served by CUs in Scotland, borrowing £24 million with another £335 million saved. This is small by banking standards, but has enormous potential, as Archbishop Justin Welby has pointed out, among others.
Josh Littlejohn (Social Bite) started out setting up an events company business. Inspired by Nobel Prize winner Muhammad Yunus and his 'social business' vision, he then set up a sandwich shop which not only offers good food but involves homeless people in running it. It has been so successful that another will be following.
At the same tim, Josh kept one event, the Scottish Business Awards, going (former US president Bill Clinton has been involved) and has also helped set up the Scottish Social Business Fund.
Kirsty Burnham's SoLoCo supports people involved in crowd-funding ventures. This helps people to build and market the business while raising funds for it - in Kirsty's instance, involving selling chocolate bricks!
Globally, 40% of the world's population exists on just 6% of its resources, Josh pointed out. Many are excluded from the business world. Charities depend on a few generous individuals. Social enterprise combines the self-propelling and self-running features of business, but with social benefit built in at every level. This is a much better way forward.
What about Credit Unions? Are they social enterprises? Yes, says Frank. The aim of the DWP and the movement is to double itself by 2019, with an emphasis on developing a technological advantage. In places like Kenya, CU's are ahead of the game by using mobile phones. There is great potential in Eutope. 200 million people use them in 100 countries, including a quarter of the populations in the US and Canada.
But will Crddit Unions's end up simply being privatised? We must guard against this. At present, they cannot be de-mutualised by law, only dissolved, and that is a great protection. It is important to keep the cherry-pickers and carpet-baggers away.
The important thing is that these bodies are built by users, not investors. They have a potential to address the major problem of financial institutions recently, which is that they are driven by shareholders with narrow interests.
There are also businesses that are somewhat 'in between', like John Lewis, which is employee owned but does not have a particular social mission.
'Community owned' has a stigma attached to it in some quarters - the idea that the quality will somehow be lower quality, This needs to be challenged. Likewise, Credit Unions should not be seen as a "poor person's bank" in the negative sense.
The dominant assumptions of business since the 1980s have been that 'private' is good and efficient, whereas 'social' or 'public' is inefficient. But the financial crash and the emergence of different models of business are questioning this profoundly.
GDP, for example, offers a money measure of 'success', but not an environmental or social impact one. In the US, sociologists and entrepreneurs are beginning to talk about the 'caring economy'.
"There is still a whole world that doesn't yet get this," observed Kirsty. "Entering our world is like entering Narnia for them, a wholly different universe."
Oxfam's Human Kind Index is one of the developing alternatives to narrow GDP growth models, indicated Martin Simes, pointing out that the social sector was in many respects outperforming the traditional private sector.
Given global developments in recent years, the first question we should ask is about the sustainability of the current system.
"The biggest problem when I came out of university was that social business was just not in my consciousness," observed Josh. Visibility is the key. Social enterprise needs its brands, and people need to get that it is something for them, not just something for someone else to do and think about.
"We need to change the language, we need to be normal," declared Martin.
"If we become a brilliant sandwich shop, then we have the edge," said Josh of Social Bite. "Because no one can compete with our story, with the involvement of homeless people, and with the other things we do."
So is there a marketing edge to all this? There is for those involved, said Martin Simes. "We get people queuing up to work in our sector. It's a significant motivator. People want to be able to do something useful with their lives."
Big investment and funding is also crucial, and it is beginning to take off in Scotland and elsewhere, he added.
"Leadership is such a key aspect in any Credit Union or social enterprise," said Frank McKillop. "Someone who can take it to the next step, but then also help to replicate and develop models and best practice. There are enthusiasts who can be trained and mentored. We have to work together to achieve succession planning - one of the most important courses we offer, though not enough people go on it!"
Education is another key. People leaving school need to know that social business is an option for them. Also, people need to see the tangible difference it makes, locally and globally. It is a question of tapping into, and broadening, the enthusasism.
At present you can do an MA in social enterprise at the University of Bangalore in India, but not in Scotland. That needs to change.
"A passionate workforce who want to bring change" is a crucial resource, Kirsty said.
What of the Co-operative movement and ideal which has deep historical roots going back to the nineteenth century? It can and does play a major role in enabling community ownership, for example of wind farms. But the Co-op Bank has run into problems, not being member-owned and being dragged in a commercially top-heavy direction.
"Being a social entrepreneur is an expensive hobby," one audience member observed. "Being an entrepreneur, full stop!", replied Kirsty. Resources for start-ups can be tough. Vision and passion can remain the same, how you get to it may change.
Where can you find information? Well, all of the supporting organisations for this conversation, and Social Enterprise Scotland, can provide support, ideas and info. Also the Yunnus Centre.
And what about governance and regulation? Frank said that he felt it was very important that good quality standards and rules were maintained in the social sector. There are, said Martin, some fraudsters out there and we need to be wary of them.
Where does social enterprise government meet social entrepreneurship? Changing the culture of government to a 'can do' one from a risk-averse or bureaucratic mentality is important. Mechanisms like Community Enterprise Companies (CiCs) can be very helpful mediating structures.
Large amounts of transparency are one of the benefits of social business. There is also a need to have support to scale up new organisations.
Just Festival director Katherine Newbigging asked about the dilution of Fairtrade and social enterprise by large corporations.
This is an issue that needs to be faced, commented Josh. "Social business needs to be a major block within the economy, which it isn't yet. We need good regulation, tax incentives, and so on."
"We shouldn't be too precious towards categorizing social enterprise. But we do have to be quite protective of what isn't social enterprise," declared Frank McKillop. "There is a present danger in our sector from those coming in to extract a profit for a small group of investors. If most of the benefit is going into private hands, it isn't really social."
So does social business need an overarching brand? There were mixed views. Different models are important. It is about spreading the socialising idea far and wide.
"A lot depends on getting the message out and getting people involved," Frank added. "Remember the Halifax - it was demutualized and then became a privately owned bank that cheated its customers and became involved in the downward spiral that led to the crash."
Social enterprise is about reversing that negative spiral. It needs to be a big part of a better future.
This has been a developing live blog... please do add comments or corrections below.
A matter of life and death
CORALIE TAPPER, a Just Festival volunteer, reviews and comment on the moving One For Ten short films shown in Edinburgh recently
------
Bringing tough issues to everyday people, giving access to the real questions and answers, exposing the reality of capital punishment and the death penalty within the United States justice system, and all at the click of a button.
One ForTen is a series of interactive documentary short films about innocence and death row. Directors Mark Pizzey and Will Francome visited Edinburgh recently as part of Just Festival to share the real stories of ten exonerees across the United States.
The concept was derived from the fact that for every ten people that have been executed since the death penalty reinstatement in the US in 1976, only one person has been set free.
In just five weeks the duo drove across eighteen states to visit ten people who have been wrongfully convicted of crimes they did not commit. Twice a week along their journey Mark and Will would drive, shoot, edit, upload and share creative, common, democratic short documentaries with their followers and the rest of the world.
Connected through various social media outlets such as facebook, twitter and the online website, their supporters were invited on a trip of discovery and exposure. This allowed them no only complete access and encouragement for their viewers to get involved in this issue, but to ask questions, give advice and share support.
As Mark puts it: “We wanted our audience to be the one asking the questions, we promised them that we would ask every question. Sometimes it was the hardest, most offensive questions which would hit a spark and cause some sort of reaction”.
Many of the ten exonerees spent over 10 years on death row, with no hope of any life or future. They were away from their families, restrained from the option of ever having a family, and in one case prevented from saving the life of one of their relatives from cancer.
One For Ten is giving these survivors, these innocent few, the chance to spread awareness of what is not only a serious issue in the US, but in the rest of the world. Still today fifty-eight countries around the world permit the death penalty and capital punishment.
The lives of these exonerees have been changed forever, but the justice system continues to exist in turmoil.
“We had done a lot of research in to each of the specific cases, you don’t think you will be surprised at the evidence and facts. However when speaking to some of these people and hearing their stories, I was shocked how many things surprised me”.
The ten different short films each feature a different theme; an issue that was a common reoccurrence for almost all exonerated cases. Racism, perjury and false accusation, expert witness testimony, DNA evidence and poor public defense council, to name a few. These concerns are compounded by forensic failures which are continuously being discovered. No effective action is being taken and innocent people are still being executed.
At the Just Festival screening, Mark and Will passionately discussed their own views and experience on this journey and campaign. They came across as wise and encouraging to those who are wanting to challenge the way we see our justice system, to question this system at every opportunity, and to help a campaign to end the death penalty.
This self-funded project was created and made possible by four compassionate filmmakers, and by organisations and supporters from around the world.
The series of documentaries is available for viewing and download on the One ForTen website. http://www.oneforten.com/
----------
(c) Coralie Tapper has been a volunteer at the 2013 Just Festival in Edinburgh. She has studied journalism. This article has also been published and syndicated through Just Festival co-sponsor Ekklesia (http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/18864).
------
Bringing tough issues to everyday people, giving access to the real questions and answers, exposing the reality of capital punishment and the death penalty within the United States justice system, and all at the click of a button.
One ForTen is a series of interactive documentary short films about innocence and death row. Directors Mark Pizzey and Will Francome visited Edinburgh recently as part of Just Festival to share the real stories of ten exonerees across the United States.
The concept was derived from the fact that for every ten people that have been executed since the death penalty reinstatement in the US in 1976, only one person has been set free.
In just five weeks the duo drove across eighteen states to visit ten people who have been wrongfully convicted of crimes they did not commit. Twice a week along their journey Mark and Will would drive, shoot, edit, upload and share creative, common, democratic short documentaries with their followers and the rest of the world.
Connected through various social media outlets such as facebook, twitter and the online website, their supporters were invited on a trip of discovery and exposure. This allowed them no only complete access and encouragement for their viewers to get involved in this issue, but to ask questions, give advice and share support.
As Mark puts it: “We wanted our audience to be the one asking the questions, we promised them that we would ask every question. Sometimes it was the hardest, most offensive questions which would hit a spark and cause some sort of reaction”.
Many of the ten exonerees spent over 10 years on death row, with no hope of any life or future. They were away from their families, restrained from the option of ever having a family, and in one case prevented from saving the life of one of their relatives from cancer.
One For Ten is giving these survivors, these innocent few, the chance to spread awareness of what is not only a serious issue in the US, but in the rest of the world. Still today fifty-eight countries around the world permit the death penalty and capital punishment.
The lives of these exonerees have been changed forever, but the justice system continues to exist in turmoil.
“We had done a lot of research in to each of the specific cases, you don’t think you will be surprised at the evidence and facts. However when speaking to some of these people and hearing their stories, I was shocked how many things surprised me”.
The ten different short films each feature a different theme; an issue that was a common reoccurrence for almost all exonerated cases. Racism, perjury and false accusation, expert witness testimony, DNA evidence and poor public defense council, to name a few. These concerns are compounded by forensic failures which are continuously being discovered. No effective action is being taken and innocent people are still being executed.
At the Just Festival screening, Mark and Will passionately discussed their own views and experience on this journey and campaign. They came across as wise and encouraging to those who are wanting to challenge the way we see our justice system, to question this system at every opportunity, and to help a campaign to end the death penalty.
This self-funded project was created and made possible by four compassionate filmmakers, and by organisations and supporters from around the world.
The series of documentaries is available for viewing and download on the One ForTen website. http://www.oneforten.com/
----------
(c) Coralie Tapper has been a volunteer at the 2013 Just Festival in Edinburgh. She has studied journalism. This article has also been published and syndicated through Just Festival co-sponsor Ekklesia (http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/18864).
Ethics, the economy and peace building
FOLLOWING hot on the heel of 'Business for the other 99%' at St John's Church this evening is an important session that is part of the joint Quaker and Just Festival lecture series, looking at Ethics in the economy in relation to peace building.
Presented by Neil Hewitt, Social and Cultural Team leader at Triodos Bank, this session will look at the important role that finance can play in making for a better world - in contrast to the scandal surrounding the speculative end of the banking industry.
Neil is responsible for a team of people at Triodos that collectively provides a total of £420 million of funding into social housing, charities, social enterprises, health, care, belief and faith groups, and arts and culture organisations.
In addition to supporting the 460 borrowing customers, the team manages over 600 deposit relationships, with funds entrusted exceeding £40 million.
This diversity enables Triodos to understand the challenges that each of these very different sectors are facing, both on a strategic and operational level.
Neil will explain why and how he is committed to making a difference, and based on the Triodos banking model, is convinced that with more conscious use of money, we can deliver a more sustainable future.
* The talk is at 8.30pm at the central Quaker Meeting House, 7 Victoria Street, Edinburgh, EH1 2JL. It cost £5 and will end by 9.45pm. Tickets at the venue. Or online via the Hub here.
Presented by Neil Hewitt, Social and Cultural Team leader at Triodos Bank, this session will look at the important role that finance can play in making for a better world - in contrast to the scandal surrounding the speculative end of the banking industry.
Neil is responsible for a team of people at Triodos that collectively provides a total of £420 million of funding into social housing, charities, social enterprises, health, care, belief and faith groups, and arts and culture organisations.
In addition to supporting the 460 borrowing customers, the team manages over 600 deposit relationships, with funds entrusted exceeding £40 million.
This diversity enables Triodos to understand the challenges that each of these very different sectors are facing, both on a strategic and operational level.
Neil will explain why and how he is committed to making a difference, and based on the Triodos banking model, is convinced that with more conscious use of money, we can deliver a more sustainable future.
* The talk is at 8.30pm at the central Quaker Meeting House, 7 Victoria Street, Edinburgh, EH1 2JL. It cost £5 and will end by 9.45pm. Tickets at the venue. Or online via the Hub here.
Business for the other 99%
MENTION the word 'business' and many people immediately think of large corporations operating in the interests of a very few - those the Occupy movement called "the 1%".
Alternatively, they think of small street corner enterprises. There can be a big gulf between the two, and between those who ostensibly run 'business' and the great majority of ordinary people.
So how can we run, own, manage and organise 'business' as if the 99% really mattered? That's the subject of the Just Festival conversation from 6-7.30pm at St John's Episcopal Church in Edinburgh (venue 127) this evening. Tickets cost £5.
In particular, there will be an emphasis on 'social business'. Seen as an instrument to tackle poverty and promote micro-finance, social enterprises have generated great interest, and not only among those who lean towards 'socialism'.
This new form of business with a ‘conscience’ is increasingly being adopted in Scotland and beyond. Yet, are they sustainable as businesses and for the communities they support?
The speakers this evening will be Frank McKillop (ABCUL), Kirsty Burnham (SoLoCo), Habib Malik (Islamic Relief Worldwide), and Josh Littlejohn (Social Bite). The chair will be Martin Sime, chief executive of the Scottish Council of Volunatry Organisations (SCVO).
Come along, find out more, and take part in the conversation. Then take in something to eat or drink in the relaxed atmosphere of the Persian Tent at St John's, if you will, and head off to the Quaker Meeting House for 8.30pm to hear about how Triodos Bank is one of the financial institutions trying to put the ethics back into business and the social back into enterprise.
Full booking details here.
You can also get tickets from the cash-only box office at the venue.
Alternatively, they think of small street corner enterprises. There can be a big gulf between the two, and between those who ostensibly run 'business' and the great majority of ordinary people.
So how can we run, own, manage and organise 'business' as if the 99% really mattered? That's the subject of the Just Festival conversation from 6-7.30pm at St John's Episcopal Church in Edinburgh (venue 127) this evening. Tickets cost £5.
In particular, there will be an emphasis on 'social business'. Seen as an instrument to tackle poverty and promote micro-finance, social enterprises have generated great interest, and not only among those who lean towards 'socialism'.
This new form of business with a ‘conscience’ is increasingly being adopted in Scotland and beyond. Yet, are they sustainable as businesses and for the communities they support?
The speakers this evening will be Frank McKillop (ABCUL), Kirsty Burnham (SoLoCo), Habib Malik (Islamic Relief Worldwide), and Josh Littlejohn (Social Bite). The chair will be Martin Sime, chief executive of the Scottish Council of Volunatry Organisations (SCVO).
Come along, find out more, and take part in the conversation. Then take in something to eat or drink in the relaxed atmosphere of the Persian Tent at St John's, if you will, and head off to the Quaker Meeting House for 8.30pm to hear about how Triodos Bank is one of the financial institutions trying to put the ethics back into business and the social back into enterprise.
Full booking details here.
You can also get tickets from the cash-only box office at the venue.
Values for Scotland's future
THE So Say Scotland workshop at Edinburgh's central Quaker Meeting House last night (20th August) ended with a group photo...


Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)