HERE we are at the Quaker Meeting House in central Edinburgh, ready to learn about a different approach to banking and how an enterprise like Triodos can make a real difference.
"Triodos is a global pioneer of sustainable banking. Our mission is to make money work for positive social, environmental and cultural change.
"More specifically, we are in business to help create a society that protects and promotes the quality of life of all its members; to enable individuals, organisations and businesses to use their money in ways that benefit people and the environment and promote sustainable development; and to provide our customers with innovative financial products and high quality service."
All that sounds very noble. But what does it mean?
Now is not a good time to be a banker. "We may have the liberty to do certain things, but are they morally correct," said Neil Hewitt. "So welcome to sustainable banking." This is about being conscious of the environmental and social impact money, transparency, linking savers and investors, focussing on the needs of future generations as well as our own.
Triodos lends deposits on for social benefit. It originated 30 years ago in the Netherlands, out of a banking crisis. The bank now has over 700 co-workers (as they are called), having grown significantly. It has been in the UK for 17 years, and five in Scotland. It took over Mercury Provident in Brighton, moving to Bristol (not London).
The aim of the organisation is to help people, both individually and collectively, to become much more aware of how money is generated and used.
The projects Triodos supports have to environmentally and socially beneficial, but also financially sustainable: that the business is there not only for today, but for tomorrow.
"Transparency is our leading way of ensuring that depositors, our customers, know where the money goes," Neil declared. All the information about the projects is published. There is no hidden funding of armaments or other negative industries.
Excellence and credibility is necessary to solidify people's relationship with the bank, because they are not just buying into values but also entrusting their resources. The management of a business that seeks to be on the leading edge has to be entrepreneurial, but also informed: about what political and funding changes are driving things like healthcare, for example.
This means that policies and products can be effective, but also support innovators in the fields where investment is going on.
Changes in the Charities Act have had a positive impact on deposit range, matching the need for a financial return with other aims.
Organic farming and ethical trading businesses (Cafe Direct, River Cottage, etc.) are an important part of what Triodos supports in the agricultural and commercial field.
Hydro, solar and other renewable energy resources are elements of the environment team's engagement, supporting industry and jobs.
The social and cultural team's work varies across housing associations, to health, faith groups, charities and more.
There is a longstanding relationship with the Camp Hill community movement, in Scotland (it started in Aberdeen after the war) and Ireland. That includes green waste and recycling in Edinburgh, as well as small holding elsewhere. "Our money is being used in a very constructive way."
When faith groups are supported, it is because of community involvement (youth, elderly people, food banks), not as a way of endorsing a particular belief system. There should not be obstacles put in the way of service.
Quakers especially, but also evangelical Christians, Buddhists and a Sikh group are among the partners.
Growth in lending, now at £580 million, has extended by 16% in the last year or so. Bad debts, meanwhile, have dwindled and are not a problem - 0.16% of the entire loan book.
But there is an awareness that the financial crisis and cuts are hitting individuals, charities, service providers and others. So Triodos seeks to work closely with them to move forward and address the issues.
So there is no 'big black book', but a determination to manage risk responsibly.
People, planet and profit are the triple 'bottom line'. Triodos declares: "Our approach is based on the fundamental belief that economic activity can and should have a positive impact on society, the environment and culture. We value people, planet and profit - and take all three into account in everything we do.
"We call this sustainable banking. And it explains why we invest only in, or lend only to, organisations that contribute to a more sustainable society."
Triodos does not have a counter service, but in Scotland uses RBS as a high street facility for its savings accounts. At present, it doesn't have a current account, but is investigating that possibility.
Questions started off with the assessment of risk, given the difficulty of predicting the return from social enterprises. How does a different lending model operate? By being mobile, intelligent and engaged.
There are no collaterialised securities, inter-bank loans etc. All is done through lending on deposit. Loans and interest are commercially priced. "We are not the cheapest, and we can't be just on price... it's the whole package."
Is liquidity a worry? "No, we're ahead of the game.." A transparent model is commercially successful, as people flee from failing 'orthodox' model.
[Note: Just Festival does not endorse particular financial products and services]
This has been an evolving live blog... please do add comments or corrections.
Wednesday, 21 August 2013
Getting down to business, socially
BUSINESS with a conscience and social enterprise to tackle poverty and improve society - these are two themes buzzing around in Scotland and more widely at the moment.
But what do they mean, and is socially driven business sustainable? If so, how? These were two of the questions posed at the beginning of this lively conversation on 'Business for the other 99%' by the chair, Martin Simes, CEO of the Scottish Council of Voluntary Service (SCVO).
The speakers this evening will be Frank McKillop (ABCUL), Kirsty Burnham (SoLoCo), and Josh Littlejohn (Social Bite). Habib Malik (Islamic Relief Worldwide) was sadly not able to be there.
Credit unions are member-owned cooperatives offering financial services, explained Frank McKillop. There are one hundred plus in Scotland, and another 300 or more elsewhere in these islands. The exception at present is Perth and Kinross, but that gap will be filled soon.
Some 327,000 people (44,000 junior savers) are served by CUs in Scotland, borrowing £24 million with another £335 million saved. This is small by banking standards, but has enormous potential, as Archbishop Justin Welby has pointed out, among others.
Josh Littlejohn (Social Bite) started out setting up an events company business. Inspired by Nobel Prize winner Muhammad Yunus and his 'social business' vision, he then set up a sandwich shop which not only offers good food but involves homeless people in running it. It has been so successful that another will be following.
At the same tim, Josh kept one event, the Scottish Business Awards, going (former US president Bill Clinton has been involved) and has also helped set up the Scottish Social Business Fund.
Kirsty Burnham's SoLoCo supports people involved in crowd-funding ventures. This helps people to build and market the business while raising funds for it - in Kirsty's instance, involving selling chocolate bricks!
Globally, 40% of the world's population exists on just 6% of its resources, Josh pointed out. Many are excluded from the business world. Charities depend on a few generous individuals. Social enterprise combines the self-propelling and self-running features of business, but with social benefit built in at every level. This is a much better way forward.
What about Credit Unions? Are they social enterprises? Yes, says Frank. The aim of the DWP and the movement is to double itself by 2019, with an emphasis on developing a technological advantage. In places like Kenya, CU's are ahead of the game by using mobile phones. There is great potential in Eutope. 200 million people use them in 100 countries, including a quarter of the populations in the US and Canada.
But will Crddit Unions's end up simply being privatised? We must guard against this. At present, they cannot be de-mutualised by law, only dissolved, and that is a great protection. It is important to keep the cherry-pickers and carpet-baggers away.
The important thing is that these bodies are built by users, not investors. They have a potential to address the major problem of financial institutions recently, which is that they are driven by shareholders with narrow interests.
There are also businesses that are somewhat 'in between', like John Lewis, which is employee owned but does not have a particular social mission.
'Community owned' has a stigma attached to it in some quarters - the idea that the quality will somehow be lower quality, This needs to be challenged. Likewise, Credit Unions should not be seen as a "poor person's bank" in the negative sense.
The dominant assumptions of business since the 1980s have been that 'private' is good and efficient, whereas 'social' or 'public' is inefficient. But the financial crash and the emergence of different models of business are questioning this profoundly.
GDP, for example, offers a money measure of 'success', but not an environmental or social impact one. In the US, sociologists and entrepreneurs are beginning to talk about the 'caring economy'.
"There is still a whole world that doesn't yet get this," observed Kirsty. "Entering our world is like entering Narnia for them, a wholly different universe."
Oxfam's Human Kind Index is one of the developing alternatives to narrow GDP growth models, indicated Martin Simes, pointing out that the social sector was in many respects outperforming the traditional private sector.
Given global developments in recent years, the first question we should ask is about the sustainability of the current system.
"The biggest problem when I came out of university was that social business was just not in my consciousness," observed Josh. Visibility is the key. Social enterprise needs its brands, and people need to get that it is something for them, not just something for someone else to do and think about.
"We need to change the language, we need to be normal," declared Martin.
"If we become a brilliant sandwich shop, then we have the edge," said Josh of Social Bite. "Because no one can compete with our story, with the involvement of homeless people, and with the other things we do."
So is there a marketing edge to all this? There is for those involved, said Martin Simes. "We get people queuing up to work in our sector. It's a significant motivator. People want to be able to do something useful with their lives."
Big investment and funding is also crucial, and it is beginning to take off in Scotland and elsewhere, he added.
"Leadership is such a key aspect in any Credit Union or social enterprise," said Frank McKillop. "Someone who can take it to the next step, but then also help to replicate and develop models and best practice. There are enthusiasts who can be trained and mentored. We have to work together to achieve succession planning - one of the most important courses we offer, though not enough people go on it!"
Education is another key. People leaving school need to know that social business is an option for them. Also, people need to see the tangible difference it makes, locally and globally. It is a question of tapping into, and broadening, the enthusasism.
At present you can do an MA in social enterprise at the University of Bangalore in India, but not in Scotland. That needs to change.
"A passionate workforce who want to bring change" is a crucial resource, Kirsty said.
What of the Co-operative movement and ideal which has deep historical roots going back to the nineteenth century? It can and does play a major role in enabling community ownership, for example of wind farms. But the Co-op Bank has run into problems, not being member-owned and being dragged in a commercially top-heavy direction.
"Being a social entrepreneur is an expensive hobby," one audience member observed. "Being an entrepreneur, full stop!", replied Kirsty. Resources for start-ups can be tough. Vision and passion can remain the same, how you get to it may change.
Where can you find information? Well, all of the supporting organisations for this conversation, and Social Enterprise Scotland, can provide support, ideas and info. Also the Yunnus Centre.
And what about governance and regulation? Frank said that he felt it was very important that good quality standards and rules were maintained in the social sector. There are, said Martin, some fraudsters out there and we need to be wary of them.
Where does social enterprise government meet social entrepreneurship? Changing the culture of government to a 'can do' one from a risk-averse or bureaucratic mentality is important. Mechanisms like Community Enterprise Companies (CiCs) can be very helpful mediating structures.
Large amounts of transparency are one of the benefits of social business. There is also a need to have support to scale up new organisations.
Just Festival director Katherine Newbigging asked about the dilution of Fairtrade and social enterprise by large corporations.
This is an issue that needs to be faced, commented Josh. "Social business needs to be a major block within the economy, which it isn't yet. We need good regulation, tax incentives, and so on."
"We shouldn't be too precious towards categorizing social enterprise. But we do have to be quite protective of what isn't social enterprise," declared Frank McKillop. "There is a present danger in our sector from those coming in to extract a profit for a small group of investors. If most of the benefit is going into private hands, it isn't really social."
So does social business need an overarching brand? There were mixed views. Different models are important. It is about spreading the socialising idea far and wide.
"A lot depends on getting the message out and getting people involved," Frank added. "Remember the Halifax - it was demutualized and then became a privately owned bank that cheated its customers and became involved in the downward spiral that led to the crash."
Social enterprise is about reversing that negative spiral. It needs to be a big part of a better future.
This has been a developing live blog... please do add comments or corrections below.
But what do they mean, and is socially driven business sustainable? If so, how? These were two of the questions posed at the beginning of this lively conversation on 'Business for the other 99%' by the chair, Martin Simes, CEO of the Scottish Council of Voluntary Service (SCVO).
The speakers this evening will be Frank McKillop (ABCUL), Kirsty Burnham (SoLoCo), and Josh Littlejohn (Social Bite). Habib Malik (Islamic Relief Worldwide) was sadly not able to be there.
Credit unions are member-owned cooperatives offering financial services, explained Frank McKillop. There are one hundred plus in Scotland, and another 300 or more elsewhere in these islands. The exception at present is Perth and Kinross, but that gap will be filled soon.
Some 327,000 people (44,000 junior savers) are served by CUs in Scotland, borrowing £24 million with another £335 million saved. This is small by banking standards, but has enormous potential, as Archbishop Justin Welby has pointed out, among others.
Josh Littlejohn (Social Bite) started out setting up an events company business. Inspired by Nobel Prize winner Muhammad Yunus and his 'social business' vision, he then set up a sandwich shop which not only offers good food but involves homeless people in running it. It has been so successful that another will be following.
At the same tim, Josh kept one event, the Scottish Business Awards, going (former US president Bill Clinton has been involved) and has also helped set up the Scottish Social Business Fund.
Kirsty Burnham's SoLoCo supports people involved in crowd-funding ventures. This helps people to build and market the business while raising funds for it - in Kirsty's instance, involving selling chocolate bricks!
Globally, 40% of the world's population exists on just 6% of its resources, Josh pointed out. Many are excluded from the business world. Charities depend on a few generous individuals. Social enterprise combines the self-propelling and self-running features of business, but with social benefit built in at every level. This is a much better way forward.
What about Credit Unions? Are they social enterprises? Yes, says Frank. The aim of the DWP and the movement is to double itself by 2019, with an emphasis on developing a technological advantage. In places like Kenya, CU's are ahead of the game by using mobile phones. There is great potential in Eutope. 200 million people use them in 100 countries, including a quarter of the populations in the US and Canada.
But will Crddit Unions's end up simply being privatised? We must guard against this. At present, they cannot be de-mutualised by law, only dissolved, and that is a great protection. It is important to keep the cherry-pickers and carpet-baggers away.
The important thing is that these bodies are built by users, not investors. They have a potential to address the major problem of financial institutions recently, which is that they are driven by shareholders with narrow interests.
There are also businesses that are somewhat 'in between', like John Lewis, which is employee owned but does not have a particular social mission.
'Community owned' has a stigma attached to it in some quarters - the idea that the quality will somehow be lower quality, This needs to be challenged. Likewise, Credit Unions should not be seen as a "poor person's bank" in the negative sense.
The dominant assumptions of business since the 1980s have been that 'private' is good and efficient, whereas 'social' or 'public' is inefficient. But the financial crash and the emergence of different models of business are questioning this profoundly.
GDP, for example, offers a money measure of 'success', but not an environmental or social impact one. In the US, sociologists and entrepreneurs are beginning to talk about the 'caring economy'.
"There is still a whole world that doesn't yet get this," observed Kirsty. "Entering our world is like entering Narnia for them, a wholly different universe."
Oxfam's Human Kind Index is one of the developing alternatives to narrow GDP growth models, indicated Martin Simes, pointing out that the social sector was in many respects outperforming the traditional private sector.
Given global developments in recent years, the first question we should ask is about the sustainability of the current system.
"The biggest problem when I came out of university was that social business was just not in my consciousness," observed Josh. Visibility is the key. Social enterprise needs its brands, and people need to get that it is something for them, not just something for someone else to do and think about.
"We need to change the language, we need to be normal," declared Martin.
"If we become a brilliant sandwich shop, then we have the edge," said Josh of Social Bite. "Because no one can compete with our story, with the involvement of homeless people, and with the other things we do."
So is there a marketing edge to all this? There is for those involved, said Martin Simes. "We get people queuing up to work in our sector. It's a significant motivator. People want to be able to do something useful with their lives."
Big investment and funding is also crucial, and it is beginning to take off in Scotland and elsewhere, he added.
"Leadership is such a key aspect in any Credit Union or social enterprise," said Frank McKillop. "Someone who can take it to the next step, but then also help to replicate and develop models and best practice. There are enthusiasts who can be trained and mentored. We have to work together to achieve succession planning - one of the most important courses we offer, though not enough people go on it!"
Education is another key. People leaving school need to know that social business is an option for them. Also, people need to see the tangible difference it makes, locally and globally. It is a question of tapping into, and broadening, the enthusasism.
At present you can do an MA in social enterprise at the University of Bangalore in India, but not in Scotland. That needs to change.
"A passionate workforce who want to bring change" is a crucial resource, Kirsty said.
What of the Co-operative movement and ideal which has deep historical roots going back to the nineteenth century? It can and does play a major role in enabling community ownership, for example of wind farms. But the Co-op Bank has run into problems, not being member-owned and being dragged in a commercially top-heavy direction.
"Being a social entrepreneur is an expensive hobby," one audience member observed. "Being an entrepreneur, full stop!", replied Kirsty. Resources for start-ups can be tough. Vision and passion can remain the same, how you get to it may change.
Where can you find information? Well, all of the supporting organisations for this conversation, and Social Enterprise Scotland, can provide support, ideas and info. Also the Yunnus Centre.
And what about governance and regulation? Frank said that he felt it was very important that good quality standards and rules were maintained in the social sector. There are, said Martin, some fraudsters out there and we need to be wary of them.
Where does social enterprise government meet social entrepreneurship? Changing the culture of government to a 'can do' one from a risk-averse or bureaucratic mentality is important. Mechanisms like Community Enterprise Companies (CiCs) can be very helpful mediating structures.
Large amounts of transparency are one of the benefits of social business. There is also a need to have support to scale up new organisations.
Just Festival director Katherine Newbigging asked about the dilution of Fairtrade and social enterprise by large corporations.
This is an issue that needs to be faced, commented Josh. "Social business needs to be a major block within the economy, which it isn't yet. We need good regulation, tax incentives, and so on."
"We shouldn't be too precious towards categorizing social enterprise. But we do have to be quite protective of what isn't social enterprise," declared Frank McKillop. "There is a present danger in our sector from those coming in to extract a profit for a small group of investors. If most of the benefit is going into private hands, it isn't really social."
So does social business need an overarching brand? There were mixed views. Different models are important. It is about spreading the socialising idea far and wide.
"A lot depends on getting the message out and getting people involved," Frank added. "Remember the Halifax - it was demutualized and then became a privately owned bank that cheated its customers and became involved in the downward spiral that led to the crash."
Social enterprise is about reversing that negative spiral. It needs to be a big part of a better future.
This has been a developing live blog... please do add comments or corrections below.
A matter of life and death
CORALIE TAPPER, a Just Festival volunteer, reviews and comment on the moving One For Ten short films shown in Edinburgh recently
------
Bringing tough issues to everyday people, giving access to the real questions and answers, exposing the reality of capital punishment and the death penalty within the United States justice system, and all at the click of a button.
One ForTen is a series of interactive documentary short films about innocence and death row. Directors Mark Pizzey and Will Francome visited Edinburgh recently as part of Just Festival to share the real stories of ten exonerees across the United States.
The concept was derived from the fact that for every ten people that have been executed since the death penalty reinstatement in the US in 1976, only one person has been set free.
In just five weeks the duo drove across eighteen states to visit ten people who have been wrongfully convicted of crimes they did not commit. Twice a week along their journey Mark and Will would drive, shoot, edit, upload and share creative, common, democratic short documentaries with their followers and the rest of the world.
Connected through various social media outlets such as facebook, twitter and the online website, their supporters were invited on a trip of discovery and exposure. This allowed them no only complete access and encouragement for their viewers to get involved in this issue, but to ask questions, give advice and share support.
As Mark puts it: “We wanted our audience to be the one asking the questions, we promised them that we would ask every question. Sometimes it was the hardest, most offensive questions which would hit a spark and cause some sort of reaction”.
Many of the ten exonerees spent over 10 years on death row, with no hope of any life or future. They were away from their families, restrained from the option of ever having a family, and in one case prevented from saving the life of one of their relatives from cancer.
One For Ten is giving these survivors, these innocent few, the chance to spread awareness of what is not only a serious issue in the US, but in the rest of the world. Still today fifty-eight countries around the world permit the death penalty and capital punishment.
The lives of these exonerees have been changed forever, but the justice system continues to exist in turmoil.
“We had done a lot of research in to each of the specific cases, you don’t think you will be surprised at the evidence and facts. However when speaking to some of these people and hearing their stories, I was shocked how many things surprised me”.
The ten different short films each feature a different theme; an issue that was a common reoccurrence for almost all exonerated cases. Racism, perjury and false accusation, expert witness testimony, DNA evidence and poor public defense council, to name a few. These concerns are compounded by forensic failures which are continuously being discovered. No effective action is being taken and innocent people are still being executed.
At the Just Festival screening, Mark and Will passionately discussed their own views and experience on this journey and campaign. They came across as wise and encouraging to those who are wanting to challenge the way we see our justice system, to question this system at every opportunity, and to help a campaign to end the death penalty.
This self-funded project was created and made possible by four compassionate filmmakers, and by organisations and supporters from around the world.
The series of documentaries is available for viewing and download on the One ForTen website. http://www.oneforten.com/
----------
(c) Coralie Tapper has been a volunteer at the 2013 Just Festival in Edinburgh. She has studied journalism. This article has also been published and syndicated through Just Festival co-sponsor Ekklesia (http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/18864).
------
Bringing tough issues to everyday people, giving access to the real questions and answers, exposing the reality of capital punishment and the death penalty within the United States justice system, and all at the click of a button.
One ForTen is a series of interactive documentary short films about innocence and death row. Directors Mark Pizzey and Will Francome visited Edinburgh recently as part of Just Festival to share the real stories of ten exonerees across the United States.
The concept was derived from the fact that for every ten people that have been executed since the death penalty reinstatement in the US in 1976, only one person has been set free.
In just five weeks the duo drove across eighteen states to visit ten people who have been wrongfully convicted of crimes they did not commit. Twice a week along their journey Mark and Will would drive, shoot, edit, upload and share creative, common, democratic short documentaries with their followers and the rest of the world.
Connected through various social media outlets such as facebook, twitter and the online website, their supporters were invited on a trip of discovery and exposure. This allowed them no only complete access and encouragement for their viewers to get involved in this issue, but to ask questions, give advice and share support.
As Mark puts it: “We wanted our audience to be the one asking the questions, we promised them that we would ask every question. Sometimes it was the hardest, most offensive questions which would hit a spark and cause some sort of reaction”.
Many of the ten exonerees spent over 10 years on death row, with no hope of any life or future. They were away from their families, restrained from the option of ever having a family, and in one case prevented from saving the life of one of their relatives from cancer.
One For Ten is giving these survivors, these innocent few, the chance to spread awareness of what is not only a serious issue in the US, but in the rest of the world. Still today fifty-eight countries around the world permit the death penalty and capital punishment.
The lives of these exonerees have been changed forever, but the justice system continues to exist in turmoil.
“We had done a lot of research in to each of the specific cases, you don’t think you will be surprised at the evidence and facts. However when speaking to some of these people and hearing their stories, I was shocked how many things surprised me”.
The ten different short films each feature a different theme; an issue that was a common reoccurrence for almost all exonerated cases. Racism, perjury and false accusation, expert witness testimony, DNA evidence and poor public defense council, to name a few. These concerns are compounded by forensic failures which are continuously being discovered. No effective action is being taken and innocent people are still being executed.
At the Just Festival screening, Mark and Will passionately discussed their own views and experience on this journey and campaign. They came across as wise and encouraging to those who are wanting to challenge the way we see our justice system, to question this system at every opportunity, and to help a campaign to end the death penalty.
This self-funded project was created and made possible by four compassionate filmmakers, and by organisations and supporters from around the world.
The series of documentaries is available for viewing and download on the One ForTen website. http://www.oneforten.com/
----------
(c) Coralie Tapper has been a volunteer at the 2013 Just Festival in Edinburgh. She has studied journalism. This article has also been published and syndicated through Just Festival co-sponsor Ekklesia (http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/18864).
Ethics, the economy and peace building
FOLLOWING hot on the heel of 'Business for the other 99%' at St John's Church this evening is an important session that is part of the joint Quaker and Just Festival lecture series, looking at Ethics in the economy in relation to peace building.
Presented by Neil Hewitt, Social and Cultural Team leader at Triodos Bank, this session will look at the important role that finance can play in making for a better world - in contrast to the scandal surrounding the speculative end of the banking industry.
Neil is responsible for a team of people at Triodos that collectively provides a total of £420 million of funding into social housing, charities, social enterprises, health, care, belief and faith groups, and arts and culture organisations.
In addition to supporting the 460 borrowing customers, the team manages over 600 deposit relationships, with funds entrusted exceeding £40 million.
This diversity enables Triodos to understand the challenges that each of these very different sectors are facing, both on a strategic and operational level.
Neil will explain why and how he is committed to making a difference, and based on the Triodos banking model, is convinced that with more conscious use of money, we can deliver a more sustainable future.
* The talk is at 8.30pm at the central Quaker Meeting House, 7 Victoria Street, Edinburgh, EH1 2JL. It cost £5 and will end by 9.45pm. Tickets at the venue. Or online via the Hub here.
Presented by Neil Hewitt, Social and Cultural Team leader at Triodos Bank, this session will look at the important role that finance can play in making for a better world - in contrast to the scandal surrounding the speculative end of the banking industry.
Neil is responsible for a team of people at Triodos that collectively provides a total of £420 million of funding into social housing, charities, social enterprises, health, care, belief and faith groups, and arts and culture organisations.
In addition to supporting the 460 borrowing customers, the team manages over 600 deposit relationships, with funds entrusted exceeding £40 million.
This diversity enables Triodos to understand the challenges that each of these very different sectors are facing, both on a strategic and operational level.
Neil will explain why and how he is committed to making a difference, and based on the Triodos banking model, is convinced that with more conscious use of money, we can deliver a more sustainable future.
* The talk is at 8.30pm at the central Quaker Meeting House, 7 Victoria Street, Edinburgh, EH1 2JL. It cost £5 and will end by 9.45pm. Tickets at the venue. Or online via the Hub here.
Business for the other 99%
MENTION the word 'business' and many people immediately think of large corporations operating in the interests of a very few - those the Occupy movement called "the 1%".
Alternatively, they think of small street corner enterprises. There can be a big gulf between the two, and between those who ostensibly run 'business' and the great majority of ordinary people.
So how can we run, own, manage and organise 'business' as if the 99% really mattered? That's the subject of the Just Festival conversation from 6-7.30pm at St John's Episcopal Church in Edinburgh (venue 127) this evening. Tickets cost £5.
In particular, there will be an emphasis on 'social business'. Seen as an instrument to tackle poverty and promote micro-finance, social enterprises have generated great interest, and not only among those who lean towards 'socialism'.
This new form of business with a ‘conscience’ is increasingly being adopted in Scotland and beyond. Yet, are they sustainable as businesses and for the communities they support?
The speakers this evening will be Frank McKillop (ABCUL), Kirsty Burnham (SoLoCo), Habib Malik (Islamic Relief Worldwide), and Josh Littlejohn (Social Bite). The chair will be Martin Sime, chief executive of the Scottish Council of Volunatry Organisations (SCVO).
Come along, find out more, and take part in the conversation. Then take in something to eat or drink in the relaxed atmosphere of the Persian Tent at St John's, if you will, and head off to the Quaker Meeting House for 8.30pm to hear about how Triodos Bank is one of the financial institutions trying to put the ethics back into business and the social back into enterprise.
Full booking details here.
You can also get tickets from the cash-only box office at the venue.
Alternatively, they think of small street corner enterprises. There can be a big gulf between the two, and between those who ostensibly run 'business' and the great majority of ordinary people.
So how can we run, own, manage and organise 'business' as if the 99% really mattered? That's the subject of the Just Festival conversation from 6-7.30pm at St John's Episcopal Church in Edinburgh (venue 127) this evening. Tickets cost £5.
In particular, there will be an emphasis on 'social business'. Seen as an instrument to tackle poverty and promote micro-finance, social enterprises have generated great interest, and not only among those who lean towards 'socialism'.
This new form of business with a ‘conscience’ is increasingly being adopted in Scotland and beyond. Yet, are they sustainable as businesses and for the communities they support?
The speakers this evening will be Frank McKillop (ABCUL), Kirsty Burnham (SoLoCo), Habib Malik (Islamic Relief Worldwide), and Josh Littlejohn (Social Bite). The chair will be Martin Sime, chief executive of the Scottish Council of Volunatry Organisations (SCVO).
Come along, find out more, and take part in the conversation. Then take in something to eat or drink in the relaxed atmosphere of the Persian Tent at St John's, if you will, and head off to the Quaker Meeting House for 8.30pm to hear about how Triodos Bank is one of the financial institutions trying to put the ethics back into business and the social back into enterprise.
Full booking details here.
You can also get tickets from the cash-only box office at the venue.
Values for Scotland's future
THE So Say Scotland workshop at Edinburgh's central Quaker Meeting House last night (20th August) ended with a group photo...


Beyond the veil
BEYOND the Veil have done an amazing job at Just Festival, running two extremely popular, full henna workshops. The hands have it!
The organisation, which I first encountered last year, seeks to promote a better understanding of Islam and Muslims through participating in community events/projects with partner organisations... like Just.
They write: "We are a Muslim Women's Group based in Edinburgh, Scotland. We aim to promote a better understanding of Islam on a basic level. As 'community activitists' we believe it is through integration and partnership that understanding on a reciprocal basis can be achieved.
"Beyond the Veil was established in Spring 2006. Since then we have been involved in many projects and with partners from accross the City and beyond.
"These include: City of Edinburgh Council; Lothian & Borders Police; NHS; Universities/Colleges in Edinburgh including the Al-Waleed Centre for the Study of Islam; Edinburgh Interfaith Association; various Churches and other places of worship; CORE; Fast Forward; CEMVO; ELREC; Muslim Council of Britain; AMINA Muslim Women's Resource Centre; ROSHNI; Blackhall Mosque, Historic Scotland; National Trust for Scotland; Scottish Natural Heritage; Al-Maghrib Institute; SOLAS Foundation and many more."
The organisation, which I first encountered last year, seeks to promote a better understanding of Islam and Muslims through participating in community events/projects with partner organisations... like Just.
They write: "We are a Muslim Women's Group based in Edinburgh, Scotland. We aim to promote a better understanding of Islam on a basic level. As 'community activitists' we believe it is through integration and partnership that understanding on a reciprocal basis can be achieved.
"Beyond the Veil was established in Spring 2006. Since then we have been involved in many projects and with partners from accross the City and beyond.
"These include: City of Edinburgh Council; Lothian & Borders Police; NHS; Universities/Colleges in Edinburgh including the Al-Waleed Centre for the Study of Islam; Edinburgh Interfaith Association; various Churches and other places of worship; CORE; Fast Forward; CEMVO; ELREC; Muslim Council of Britain; AMINA Muslim Women's Resource Centre; ROSHNI; Blackhall Mosque, Historic Scotland; National Trust for Scotland; Scottish Natural Heritage; Al-Maghrib Institute; SOLAS Foundation and many more."
Tuesday, 20 August 2013
Participation is the key to Scotland's future
THINKING Together: Co-Creating Peace is underway at the Quaker Meeting House in central Edinburgh, as part of Just Festival and the Quaker festival lecture series.
More a workshop and discussion than a presentation, the emphasis is on how dialogue, creativity, empowerment, participation and networking can help to generate the democratic innovation needed for developing Scotland's future in a positive way.
Obviously the upcoming independence referendum has focussed attention on where the country is going, but the idea of this evening is not to get into a 'yes' versus 'no' debate, but to see how people in Scotland can find new ways of working together whatever the outcome of 2014.
Inspired by a process used in Iceland, and supported by a bevy of collaborating partners and volunteers, So Say Scotland hosted their first Citizens' Assembly earlier this year.
'Thinking Together' was and is a people's process, drawing on an enabled gathering of 76 people at the galvanising event, who were encouraged to "exercise their democratic muscle".
Issues of what we mean by and want from welfare, environment, economy, politics and more came to the fore in the conversations - starting with the sharing of values.
"There is an energy that comes from coming together", one participant said. The process was designed to ensure that all voices were heard, with an opportunity for people to gather and synthesise ideas themselves, rather than have it done for them or to them.
So say Scotland says: "Participative and deliberative democracy is a complement to and an evolution of representative democracy: anywhere a citizen gets closer to the decision making process and does that in collaboration with others.
"Every process and tool has different elements of participation and deliberation, understanding this is also essential to effective use of the process and tools. Deliberation can be defined as ‘an exchange of reasons aimed at transforming the preference of others’.
This means things like: Open Space, World CafĂ©, Wisdom Councils, Referendums, Cooperatives/Employee Ownership, Community Land Buy Out, Citizen Assemblies/Juries/Panels & Deliberative Polling, Participatory Budgeting, Pupils Councils, DEMOCS, and Co‐production.
More information here.
More a workshop and discussion than a presentation, the emphasis is on how dialogue, creativity, empowerment, participation and networking can help to generate the democratic innovation needed for developing Scotland's future in a positive way.
Obviously the upcoming independence referendum has focussed attention on where the country is going, but the idea of this evening is not to get into a 'yes' versus 'no' debate, but to see how people in Scotland can find new ways of working together whatever the outcome of 2014.
Inspired by a process used in Iceland, and supported by a bevy of collaborating partners and volunteers, So Say Scotland hosted their first Citizens' Assembly earlier this year.
'Thinking Together' was and is a people's process, drawing on an enabled gathering of 76 people at the galvanising event, who were encouraged to "exercise their democratic muscle".
Issues of what we mean by and want from welfare, environment, economy, politics and more came to the fore in the conversations - starting with the sharing of values.
"There is an energy that comes from coming together", one participant said. The process was designed to ensure that all voices were heard, with an opportunity for people to gather and synthesise ideas themselves, rather than have it done for them or to them.
So say Scotland says: "Participative and deliberative democracy is a complement to and an evolution of representative democracy: anywhere a citizen gets closer to the decision making process and does that in collaboration with others.
"Every process and tool has different elements of participation and deliberation, understanding this is also essential to effective use of the process and tools. Deliberation can be defined as ‘an exchange of reasons aimed at transforming the preference of others’.
This means things like: Open Space, World CafĂ©, Wisdom Councils, Referendums, Cooperatives/Employee Ownership, Community Land Buy Out, Citizen Assemblies/Juries/Panels & Deliberative Polling, Participatory Budgeting, Pupils Councils, DEMOCS, and Co‐production.
More information here.
All in this together - but how?
“WHAT do we mean by a good society? What can and do churches or faith groups contribute to the development of such a society?”
Those were the questions that began an ecumenical investigation into perceptions of common good, from which tonight's conversation takes its cue.
"A good society is much more interesting than 'the big society', which was in vogue a few years ago," noted Bishop John Armes in his introduction. "We all think we know what we mean by 'good', but maybe it isn't so clear when you dig a little deeper."
The speakers, the Rev Padraig Gallagher (Church in Wales) and June Fearns (Hamilton, west of Scotland), are practitioners. That is where the discussion needs to start, Bishop Armes declared.
"I'm a supporter, not a leader... a facilitator at St Mary's [Hamilton], where there are so many activities involving a whole range of people," June said. Her background is in education, and her involvement began when an atheist, rather than a believer, in her workplace suggested a childrens and parents' project for vulnerable families, now called Circle.
"I wasn't a regular church-goer at that point," she added. "That was eleven years ago. I've been going every Sunday since. I found a church where when you go there is always a warm welcome... and they are opening the church to other people with no 'payback', no strings attached."
"I asked, 'why are you doing this?' and the answer was 'God's love in action.... We started with one worker working with five vulnerable families in a hall near St Mary's. It has grown from there... You now have to book into the hall."
People with addictions, released women prisoners and family groups living on the edge are among those who have been positively benefitting from the project. Reoffending has been cut dramatically. There is also an estranged parents group, who use a flat as a homely setting to meet children in association with legal services and the court system.
Alcoholics Anonymous now use the church three times a week, and 150 people are involved on a regular basis.
'How did I get involved in Wales? I was appointed by the bishop in the parish in Swansea north east. I became part of a 'community first' area, " said Padraig Gallagher.
The programme itself, he explained, was sparked by an initiative of the Welsh Assembly government tackling deprivation and poverty, and looking at sustainable regeneration - skilling people, empowering them.
Many of those Padraig works with have been out of work for a long time, and basic education and skills are lacking. This is a huge gap, contributing to a cycle of deprivation. The work began with a development trust, which Padraig chairs.
"Our church sits nicely there in the midst of things, I thought... wouldn't it be nice if more people went out into the community... God is out there, and if you go out you might meet God, rather than expecting God just to be in here, in church," he explained. Work with schools is part of what is involved in this, a meeting point for young and old.
"What I'd like to see is a much more equal world where people have opportunity - and the opportunity to take that opportunity... an open door society." That was June's response to Bishop Armes' question, "what would a good society look like... given that much what we have been talking about so far is a broken society."
She went on to offer some definitions she had looked up herself. "Those with whom one has companionship... a system of human organisation - usually protection, security and identity. A good society is where everyone has self-esteem."
"People I live with", said Padraig, "don't like God... they live chaotic lives. A good society has to start by being non-judgemental, recognising that every person matters, and that we have to work together to make a difference. Despite people's external differences, there is good there, care and compassion. But it does not always manifest itself in ways we commonly expect."
Those on benefits are accused of being scroungers, "but what about the companies that do not pay a living wage?" asked Padraig. We need a change of attitudes, and within the churches a renewal of faith in the possibility of good.
June spoke of a woman who now says of the community-engaged church, "I like to come". A very simple thing. "If the church is just open for that one woman, it matters. The church needs to be like an 'eccentric tea-pot'... quirky, odd maybe, but hospitable and of use."
Similarly, Padraig talked about families whose tough lives had been inspired or changed in little but highly significant ways. "When I was in the nuthouse, he was the only one that bothered about me."
The speakers then asked two questions of the audience: "Why are you here?" and "What difference can you make?"
One response was about the need to address the gap between the goodness of some individuals and the overall tendency within the wider social order for this to be lost.
There are many poor who are "rich in other ways", it had been acknowledged. An audience member said that there were also rich people who were poor in other ways - leading Bishop Armes to reference the findings of The Spirit Level on the benefits of a more equal society.
Funding for the work in Swansea and Hamilton respectively was raised. Both June and Padraig said that they received little direct money, but there were resources available through collaboration on projects.
"[Communities] become trapped in themselves, with little chance to connect and share," Padraig observed... It's about creating opportunities for these organisations to work together."
Archbishop Justin Welby's challenging of payday loan companies and advocacy of credit unions as part of the alternative, focussed on the local situation, was welcomed.
CTBI's report A Good Society will be published in the Autumn, and one intention is to place it before the Welsh Assembly Government, the Scottish Government and others. Hearing the voices of individuals and communities is an important part of this process.
People from across the spectrum of cultural and social life have been talked to as part of the project, in seven different places throughout the UK. There is a wide range, though the project does not claim to be comprehensive.
The aim, whether in Swansea, Liverpool, Birmingham, Northern Ireland and elsewhere was to look at different experiences, including those crossing boundaries and building bridges.
"We are not trying to say that any of these places or individuals are representative... it is what we draw out of what they say that matters," a spokeswoman for the CTBI process stressed.
"Part of the church's aim is to demonstrate a different way of relating to what is sometimes practiced in wider society," one respondent said.
"A good society should not be thought of as something that can only be provided by people who do not get paid for it," another reminded us, citing health and educations workers and other professional people who contribute enormously to wellbeing, and intentionally wish to do so.
'Additionality' is something voluntary projects need to think about: what can be added for social benefit. "Our role is facilitation and support", June said.
"We cannot and should not offer everything, but we can provide space and encourage caring," an audience member responded.
"When the welfare state was set up it wasn't intended to stop people caring," said Bishop Armes. "But the bad thing is that gaps that are opening.... Churches are now trying to fill those gaps, but this should not be used to justify the gaps."
The question of what deprivation we are able to see and what we cannot see was raised.
"We are spending an awful lot of money addressing poverty," said Padraig. "But surely we could use our resources better?" And how do we address underlying causes of poverty, not just symptoms?
There are problems in our society, but for others who come here it seems to be a good one, someone suggested. But there is "such a huge gulf" between those with and those without... "two separate societies," another responded.
The Church Action on Poverty and Christian Aid report Walking the Breadline was cited - showing, among other things, that it costs more to be poor, for example in purchasing food, in a less mobile environment with less choice.
A fruit and veg coop has been one response in Swansea, as well as lobbying supermarkets.
Challenging the victimisation of migrants, including the stopping and searching of predominantly non-white people by UKBA, "that is the kind of thing we can do," another audience member suggested. "Because I do not want to live in a society that picks on people who are different...".
This raised the issue of asylum seekers, and more generally of political action to challenge injustices within the social order.
"Are we politically active in the broad sense?' asked June. "I have friends who use [petition and lobbying website] 38 Degrees. How often do we question those standing for election?"
She cited Margaret Mead: "Never doubt that a small group of committed people can change the world - indeed its the only thing that ever has."
To what extent do those of different faiths and backgrounds turn up at conversations like this, it was asked, given that the audience looked older, whiter and more Christian than some felt comfortable with.
"Many from different backgrounds would share the values we have been talking about here," said Bishop Armes. A Muslim member of the audience agreed, but said that the public space for debate was not always as open as we liked to think.
"A good society would be one that is seeking to break down these barriers," noted Padraig.
In other secular groups faith is seen as peripheral, said a participant who spoke of the benefit of cross-community organising and advocacy, as has been developed in London and other places.
And what of the scope for redemption and empathy? There is a faith language about this, but also an opportunity to engage those of good faith but not particular religious convictions.
"I think a key feature of a good society is openness to one another - not to welcome people into a society that belongs to me, but to question my (our) own perspective," a St John's member said.
"What I've taken out of tonight is not to be quiet," June concluded. For Padraig it was, "I don't have all the answers... but this has got me thinking. We can easily get set in our own local situations. We need to look at the bigger picture and put things into perspective."
"One of the things that makes society less than good is disconnection, through class, race and socio-economic factors. Also part of this is a lack of empathy," concluded Bishop Armes. "A good society involves recovering a sense of connectedness by going out and doing something."
This has been a developing live blog.
Those were the questions that began an ecumenical investigation into perceptions of common good, from which tonight's conversation takes its cue.
"A good society is much more interesting than 'the big society', which was in vogue a few years ago," noted Bishop John Armes in his introduction. "We all think we know what we mean by 'good', but maybe it isn't so clear when you dig a little deeper."
The speakers, the Rev Padraig Gallagher (Church in Wales) and June Fearns (Hamilton, west of Scotland), are practitioners. That is where the discussion needs to start, Bishop Armes declared.
"I'm a supporter, not a leader... a facilitator at St Mary's [Hamilton], where there are so many activities involving a whole range of people," June said. Her background is in education, and her involvement began when an atheist, rather than a believer, in her workplace suggested a childrens and parents' project for vulnerable families, now called Circle.
"I wasn't a regular church-goer at that point," she added. "That was eleven years ago. I've been going every Sunday since. I found a church where when you go there is always a warm welcome... and they are opening the church to other people with no 'payback', no strings attached."
"I asked, 'why are you doing this?' and the answer was 'God's love in action.... We started with one worker working with five vulnerable families in a hall near St Mary's. It has grown from there... You now have to book into the hall."
People with addictions, released women prisoners and family groups living on the edge are among those who have been positively benefitting from the project. Reoffending has been cut dramatically. There is also an estranged parents group, who use a flat as a homely setting to meet children in association with legal services and the court system.
Alcoholics Anonymous now use the church three times a week, and 150 people are involved on a regular basis.
'How did I get involved in Wales? I was appointed by the bishop in the parish in Swansea north east. I became part of a 'community first' area, " said Padraig Gallagher.
The programme itself, he explained, was sparked by an initiative of the Welsh Assembly government tackling deprivation and poverty, and looking at sustainable regeneration - skilling people, empowering them.
Many of those Padraig works with have been out of work for a long time, and basic education and skills are lacking. This is a huge gap, contributing to a cycle of deprivation. The work began with a development trust, which Padraig chairs.
"Our church sits nicely there in the midst of things, I thought... wouldn't it be nice if more people went out into the community... God is out there, and if you go out you might meet God, rather than expecting God just to be in here, in church," he explained. Work with schools is part of what is involved in this, a meeting point for young and old.
"What I'd like to see is a much more equal world where people have opportunity - and the opportunity to take that opportunity... an open door society." That was June's response to Bishop Armes' question, "what would a good society look like... given that much what we have been talking about so far is a broken society."
She went on to offer some definitions she had looked up herself. "Those with whom one has companionship... a system of human organisation - usually protection, security and identity. A good society is where everyone has self-esteem."
"People I live with", said Padraig, "don't like God... they live chaotic lives. A good society has to start by being non-judgemental, recognising that every person matters, and that we have to work together to make a difference. Despite people's external differences, there is good there, care and compassion. But it does not always manifest itself in ways we commonly expect."
Those on benefits are accused of being scroungers, "but what about the companies that do not pay a living wage?" asked Padraig. We need a change of attitudes, and within the churches a renewal of faith in the possibility of good.
June spoke of a woman who now says of the community-engaged church, "I like to come". A very simple thing. "If the church is just open for that one woman, it matters. The church needs to be like an 'eccentric tea-pot'... quirky, odd maybe, but hospitable and of use."
Similarly, Padraig talked about families whose tough lives had been inspired or changed in little but highly significant ways. "When I was in the nuthouse, he was the only one that bothered about me."
The speakers then asked two questions of the audience: "Why are you here?" and "What difference can you make?"
One response was about the need to address the gap between the goodness of some individuals and the overall tendency within the wider social order for this to be lost.
There are many poor who are "rich in other ways", it had been acknowledged. An audience member said that there were also rich people who were poor in other ways - leading Bishop Armes to reference the findings of The Spirit Level on the benefits of a more equal society.
Funding for the work in Swansea and Hamilton respectively was raised. Both June and Padraig said that they received little direct money, but there were resources available through collaboration on projects.
"[Communities] become trapped in themselves, with little chance to connect and share," Padraig observed... It's about creating opportunities for these organisations to work together."
Archbishop Justin Welby's challenging of payday loan companies and advocacy of credit unions as part of the alternative, focussed on the local situation, was welcomed.
CTBI's report A Good Society will be published in the Autumn, and one intention is to place it before the Welsh Assembly Government, the Scottish Government and others. Hearing the voices of individuals and communities is an important part of this process.
People from across the spectrum of cultural and social life have been talked to as part of the project, in seven different places throughout the UK. There is a wide range, though the project does not claim to be comprehensive.
The aim, whether in Swansea, Liverpool, Birmingham, Northern Ireland and elsewhere was to look at different experiences, including those crossing boundaries and building bridges.
"We are not trying to say that any of these places or individuals are representative... it is what we draw out of what they say that matters," a spokeswoman for the CTBI process stressed.
"Part of the church's aim is to demonstrate a different way of relating to what is sometimes practiced in wider society," one respondent said.
"A good society should not be thought of as something that can only be provided by people who do not get paid for it," another reminded us, citing health and educations workers and other professional people who contribute enormously to wellbeing, and intentionally wish to do so.
'Additionality' is something voluntary projects need to think about: what can be added for social benefit. "Our role is facilitation and support", June said.
"We cannot and should not offer everything, but we can provide space and encourage caring," an audience member responded.
"When the welfare state was set up it wasn't intended to stop people caring," said Bishop Armes. "But the bad thing is that gaps that are opening.... Churches are now trying to fill those gaps, but this should not be used to justify the gaps."
The question of what deprivation we are able to see and what we cannot see was raised.
"We are spending an awful lot of money addressing poverty," said Padraig. "But surely we could use our resources better?" And how do we address underlying causes of poverty, not just symptoms?
There are problems in our society, but for others who come here it seems to be a good one, someone suggested. But there is "such a huge gulf" between those with and those without... "two separate societies," another responded.
The Church Action on Poverty and Christian Aid report Walking the Breadline was cited - showing, among other things, that it costs more to be poor, for example in purchasing food, in a less mobile environment with less choice.
A fruit and veg coop has been one response in Swansea, as well as lobbying supermarkets.
Challenging the victimisation of migrants, including the stopping and searching of predominantly non-white people by UKBA, "that is the kind of thing we can do," another audience member suggested. "Because I do not want to live in a society that picks on people who are different...".
This raised the issue of asylum seekers, and more generally of political action to challenge injustices within the social order.
"Are we politically active in the broad sense?' asked June. "I have friends who use [petition and lobbying website] 38 Degrees. How often do we question those standing for election?"
She cited Margaret Mead: "Never doubt that a small group of committed people can change the world - indeed its the only thing that ever has."
To what extent do those of different faiths and backgrounds turn up at conversations like this, it was asked, given that the audience looked older, whiter and more Christian than some felt comfortable with.
"Many from different backgrounds would share the values we have been talking about here," said Bishop Armes. A Muslim member of the audience agreed, but said that the public space for debate was not always as open as we liked to think.
"A good society would be one that is seeking to break down these barriers," noted Padraig.
In other secular groups faith is seen as peripheral, said a participant who spoke of the benefit of cross-community organising and advocacy, as has been developed in London and other places.
And what of the scope for redemption and empathy? There is a faith language about this, but also an opportunity to engage those of good faith but not particular religious convictions.
"I think a key feature of a good society is openness to one another - not to welcome people into a society that belongs to me, but to question my (our) own perspective," a St John's member said.
"What I've taken out of tonight is not to be quiet," June concluded. For Padraig it was, "I don't have all the answers... but this has got me thinking. We can easily get set in our own local situations. We need to look at the bigger picture and put things into perspective."
"One of the things that makes society less than good is disconnection, through class, race and socio-economic factors. Also part of this is a lack of empathy," concluded Bishop Armes. "A good society involves recovering a sense of connectedness by going out and doing something."
This has been a developing live blog.
A good start...
DESPITE the rain that descended on Edinburgh this afternoon, a good audience is waiting outside for tonight's conversation at St John's, which looks at people's ideas of what 'a good society' is and can be.
The discussion arises from a church photojournalism project which took the question around to a variety of communities across Scotland, England, Wales and Ireland, asking what faith communities can contribute to the discussion about common good.
The speakers this evening, looking forward to a good exchange with the audience, are the Rev Padraig Gallagher (Church in Wales left) and June Fearns (Hamilton, right). The chair is the Rt Rev Dr John Armes (pictured centre, Episcopal Bishop of Edinburgh, and former rector of St John's Church, Edinburgh, where Just Festival has its base).
We are about to get underway, and live blogging will commence once more... Look for the next entry on Just Festival News.
The discussion arises from a church photojournalism project which took the question around to a variety of communities across Scotland, England, Wales and Ireland, asking what faith communities can contribute to the discussion about common good.
The speakers this evening, looking forward to a good exchange with the audience, are the Rev Padraig Gallagher (Church in Wales left) and June Fearns (Hamilton, right). The chair is the Rt Rev Dr John Armes (pictured centre, Episcopal Bishop of Edinburgh, and former rector of St John's Church, Edinburgh, where Just Festival has its base).
We are about to get underway, and live blogging will commence once more... Look for the next entry on Just Festival News.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)